Ecografía automática de mama para la detección de lesiones mamarias: comparación con la ecografía mamaria convencional
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Daimiel Naranjo, Isaac
Linares González, Susana
Mollinedo, Diana
Álvarez Perez, Leire
Advisors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Objetivos: Comparar la ecografía convencional frente a la ecografía automática de mama
(ABUS) y la mamografía con tomosíntesis aislada en la detección y el diagnóstico de lesiones
mamarias.
Sujetos y métodos: Se incluyeron 155 mujeres sintomáticas y asintomáticas con mamas densas.
Todas se realizaron mamografía y seguidamente ecografía manual y ABUS, que fueron interpretadas por 2 radiólogos diferentes. Los estudios fueron categorizados según el Breast Imaging
Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
Resultados: El índice kappa de concordancia fue de 0,83, p < 0,05. Los 5 carcinomas encontrados
fueron diagnosticados por ambas técnicas de imagen de ultrasonidos, siendo en 2 de ellos la
mamografía normal. ABUS detectó 2 lesiones benignas no vistas con la ecografía manual.
Conclusión: ABUS demostró alta correlación con la ecografía manual detectando más lesiones benignas. El diagnóstico de las malignas fue equivalente con ambas técnicas, que fueron
superiores a la mamografía de forma aislada. ABUS podría sustituir a la ecografía manual para
complementar a la mamografía en la detección de cáncer de mama en mujeres con mama
densa.
Objectives: To compare automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and tomosynthesis mammography in the detection and characterisation of breast lesions. Subjects and methods: A total of 155 symptomatic and asymptomatic women with dense breasts underwent tomosynthesis followed by ABUS and HHUS. The studies were read and graded by two different radiologists according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Results: The kappa index of agreement was 0.83, p < 0.05. All of the 5 carcinomas found were diagnosed by ABUS and HHUS. Tomosynthesis was normal in 2 out of 5 cases. ABUS identified 2 benign lesions not detected with HHUS. Conclusion: This study found a high correlation between ABUS and HHUS. More benign lesions were identified by ABUS while malignant lesions were detected equally by both techniques. ABUS and HHUS were superior to tomosynthesis in the detection of lesions. ABUS could replace HHUS, complementing mammography in the detection of lesions in women with dense breasts.
Objectives: To compare automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and tomosynthesis mammography in the detection and characterisation of breast lesions. Subjects and methods: A total of 155 symptomatic and asymptomatic women with dense breasts underwent tomosynthesis followed by ABUS and HHUS. The studies were read and graded by two different radiologists according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Results: The kappa index of agreement was 0.83, p < 0.05. All of the 5 carcinomas found were diagnosed by ABUS and HHUS. Tomosynthesis was normal in 2 out of 5 cases. ABUS identified 2 benign lesions not detected with HHUS. Conclusion: This study found a high correlation between ABUS and HHUS. More benign lesions were identified by ABUS while malignant lesions were detected equally by both techniques. ABUS and HHUS were superior to tomosynthesis in the detection of lesions. ABUS could replace HHUS, complementing mammography in the detection of lesions in women with dense breasts.
Description
UNESCO Subjects
Keywords
Bibliographic reference
Daimiel, I., Martínez, V., Vega, D., y Linares, S. (2018). Ecografía automática de mama para la detección de lesiones mamarias: comparación con la ecografía mamaria convencional. Revista de Senología y Patología Mamaria, 31(3), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.senol.2018.05.001






