Fitting success for three multifocal designs: Multicentre randomised trial

dc.contributor.authorNovillo Díaz, Emilia
dc.contributor.authorVilla Collar, César
dc.contributor.authorNarváez Peña, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Martín, José Luis
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-09T08:22:25Z
dc.date.available2018-01-09T08:22:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractTo determine if the discontinuation of commercially-available simultaneous vision Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses is independent from the multifocal design. To determine causes for discontinuation and psychosocial factors involved. METHODS: Multicentre single-blinded randomised controlled trial with external blinded evaluation for a three months follow-up period for three intervention groups. 150 single-vision soft wearers were randomly assigned a spherical near centred lens (S-CN), distance centred lens (CD) or aspherical near centred lens (A-CN). Cases of discontinuation, anxiety and quality of life were measured at one week and one month. RESULTS: 120 females and 30 males were included with an age range of 40-62 (48.79 ± 5.23). At one month, the S-CN design had a statistically significant higher risk of discontinuation than the other two OR: 6.12 (95%CI 2.5-14.9). Twenty-eight subjects discontinued wearing S-CN at first week (56%), while discontinuation of CD and A-CD were 15 (30%) and 11 (22%), with a statistically significant difference between S-CN design and the other two (p = 0.001). There were not statistically significant differences when direct comparison between discontinuation of CD and A-CN was made (p = 0.36). Thirty-two percent discontinued the use because of poor distance vision and 28% because of both poor distance and near vision. Psychosocial factors were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses is dependent on the design. Most common cause for discontinuation is poor distance vision. Psychosocial factors do not impact on discontinuation rates. [Publisher abstract].spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact1.985 JCR (2018) Q2, 30/60 Ophthalmologyspa
dc.description.impact0.771 SJR (2018) Q2, 4/12 Optometry, 42/126 Ophthalmology, 832/2844 Medicine (miscellaneous)spa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2018spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationNovillo-Díaz, E., Villa-Collar, C., Narváez-Peña, M., & Martín, J. L. R. (2018). Fitting success for three multifocal designs: Multicentre randomised trial. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 41(3), 258-262. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.12.012.spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clae.2017.12.012
dc.identifier.issn1367-0484
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/6994
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemLentes de contactospa
dc.subject.unescoOftalmologíaspa
dc.titleFitting success for three multifocal designs: Multicentre randomised trialspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione19cbc49-41e7-4085-8afe-3e6d6a1608eb
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbbe0c06b-e0ec-4b85-84ac-00592613f9fb
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf0c29dee-37b3-4e88-b3eb-afc84c78a3af
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye19cbc49-41e7-4085-8afe-3e6d6a1608eb

Files