Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients

dc.contributor.authorCastellucci, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorLinares Quevedo, Ana Isabel
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Gómez, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorDíez Rodríguez, Jesús María
dc.contributor.authorCogorno Wasylkowsky, Leopoldo
dc.contributor.authorCogollos Acuña, Isidro
dc.contributor.authorSalmerón Béliz, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Fernández de Legaría, Marta
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Piñeiro, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T15:32:12Z
dc.date.available2021-01-27T15:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBackground: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy in cancer prostate (PCa) of Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) targeted biopsy compared to standard systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB) in biopsy-naïve patients. Methods: A total of 168 biopsy-naïve men with clinical suspicion of PCa due to elevated PSA levels and/or an abnormal digital rectal examination were consecutively enrolled from July 2011 to July 2014. All patients underwent TRUSGB. Patients with equivocal (Pi-rads 3) or suspicious lesion (Pi-rads 4-5), were additionally biopsied using two cores, by the same operator (cognitive technique). Results: Among the 168 cases, mp-MRI was equivocal for PCa (Pi-rads 3) in 46 subjects (27.4%) and suspicious (Pi-rads 4, 5) in 40 cases (23.8%). Of the 69 patients with PCa, standard TRUSGB showed Gleason ≥7 in 75% of patients with Pirads 3 and 77.8% in cases with Pirads 4-5 on mp-MRI. Among the 40 patients with Pi-rads 4-5 lesion on the MRI, cognitive mp-MRI-guided biopsy (MRCGB) detected a higher number of cases of PCa with a Gleason score equal or superior to 7 (90%) with a higher negative predictive value (97.5%) than cases with Pi-rads 3 lesion or subjects with TRUSGB alone. Conclusions: mp-MRI followed by selective biopsy seems to be a valuable tool to improve the diagnosis of intermediate and high risk PCa compared to standard TRUSGB.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact1.449 JCR (2017) Q3, 56/76 Urology & Nephrologyspa
dc.description.impact0.439 SJR (2017) Q3, 43/66 Nephrologyspa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2017spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationCastellucci, R., Linares Quevedo, A. I., Sánchez Gómez, F. J., Díez Rodríguez, J., Cogorno, L., Cogollos Acuña, I., Salmerón Béliz, I., Muñoz Fernández de Legaría, M., & Martínez Piñeiro, L. (2017). Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients. Minerva Urológica e Nefrológica = The Italian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 69(6), 589–595. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02845-4spa
dc.identifier.doi10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02845-4
dc.identifier.issn1827-1758
dc.identifier.issn0393-2249
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/9794
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.otherNeoplasias de la próstataspa
dc.subject.otherMedicina preventivaspa
dc.subject.otherUltrasonido enfocado transrectal de alta intensidadspa
dc.subject.unescoCáncerspa
dc.subject.unescoMedicina preventivaspa
dc.subject.unescoTecnología médicaspa
dc.titleProspective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patientsspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication28ffd3dd-de04-47a9-b951-8819678dd48c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery28ffd3dd-de04-47a9-b951-8819678dd48c

Files