Effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage vs. perineal massage in secundigravida women with gestational oedema: A randomised clinical trial

dc.contributor.authorCueva Reguera, Mónica de la
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Sanz, David
dc.contributor.authorCalvo Lobo, César 
dc.contributor.authorFernández Martínez, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Pascual, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorRobledo do Nascimiento, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Morales, María
dc.contributor.authorRomero Morales, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T19:09:37Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T19:09:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPerineal trauma (PT) may be considered as a very common injury during the childbirth. The incidence of PT was estimated in 30% to 85%, with 60% to 70% requiring suture. The present study was a prospective, single‐blinded, randomised, clinical trial carried out from January 2015 to January 2016. For this study, 49 secundigravida women diagnosed with gestational oedema were recruited and randomly divided into two groups (A and B). Group A (n = 30) received the conventional treatment plus perineal massage and group B (n = 19) the conventional treatment plus manual lymphatic drainage (MLD). Visual analogue scale (VAS) and King Health's Questionnaire (KHQ) were performed to assess pain intensity and quality of life‐related with urinary incontinence (UI). Pain intensity measurements showed statistically significant differences for a decrease after 30‐weeks (P = .037), after 36‐weeks (P = .000), and at the end of puerperium (P = .014) for MLD with respect to perineal massage group. Moreover, inter‐groups repeated measures ANOVA for the values related statistically significant differences to the interaction of each applied treatment (perineal massage and MLD group, separately) over the pain intensity variable. MLD treatment reduced pain intensity with respect to perineal massage in secundigravida women with gestational oedema from 25‐weeks of gestation to the end of puerperium.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact3.315 JCR (2020) Q2, 29/68 Dermatologyspa
dc.description.impact0.867 SJR (2020) Q1, 23/138 Dermatologyspa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2019spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationCueva‐Reguera, M., Rodríguez‐Sanz, D., Calvo‐Lobo, C., Fernández‐Martínez, S., Martínez‐Pascual, B., Robledo‐Do‐Nascimento, Y., Blanco‐Morales, M., & Romero‐Morales, C. (2020). Effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage vs. perineal massage in secundigravida women with gestational oedema: A randomised clinical trial. International Wound Journal, 17(5), 1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13427spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/iwj.13427
dc.identifier.issn1742-481X
dc.identifier.issn1742-4801
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/9210
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://ezproxy.universidadeuropea.es/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13427spa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemMujeres embarazadasspa
dc.subject.uemDrenaje linfático manualspa
dc.subject.unescoEmbarazospa
dc.subject.unescoTratamiento médicospa
dc.titleEffectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage vs. perineal massage in secundigravida women with gestational oedema: A randomised clinical trialspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication95b6ec06-3a66-40ca-a273-dd8e15dbe320
relation.isAuthorOfPublication43641780-6ebb-488f-8857-532d1133ace6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication224f44e5-15ae-48f2-8e32-ac0879c24e79
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc6c78751-d937-45f2-8f91-436a8b876f65
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione4abe70b-d273-468d-8077-ef43d1e10010
relation.isAuthorOfPublication976417fb-2659-472c-b394-e26bfdffe21d
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf7e55b2b-699c-4e9e-b57a-d4faaee07ffe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery95b6ec06-3a66-40ca-a273-dd8e15dbe320

Files