Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
| dc.contributor.author | Pérez González, Alexandre | |
| dc.contributor.author | Suárez García, Inés | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ocampo, Antonio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Poveda, Eva | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-18T14:50:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-18T14:50:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The effectiveness of first-generation 3DRs allowed a dramatic increase in the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients, although it was associated with several side effects and ART-related toxicities. The development of novel two-drug regimens (2DRs) started in the mid-2000s in order to minimize side effects, reduce drug–drug interactions and improve treatment compliance. Several clinical trials compared 2DRs and 3DRs in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients and showed the non-inferiority of 2DRs in terms of efficacy, which led to 2DRs being used as first-line treatment in several clinical scenarios, according to HIV clinical guidelines. In this review, we summarize the current evidence, research gaps and future prospects of 2DRs | spa |
| dc.description.filiation | UEM | spa |
| dc.description.impact | 4.5 Q2 JCR 2022 | spa |
| dc.description.impact | 0.909 Q2 SJR 2022 | spa |
| dc.description.impact | No data IDR 2022 | spa |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CM20/00243) | spa |
| dc.identifier.citation | Pérez-González, A., Suárez-García, I., Ocampo, A., & Poveda, E. (2022). Two-drug regimens for hiv—Current evidence, research gaps and future challenges. Microorganisms, 10(2), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020433 | spa |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/microorganisms10020433 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2076-2607 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11268/12178 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
| dc.peerreviewed | Si | spa |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020433 | spa |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | spa |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | spa |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | spa |
| dc.subject.other | Antirretrovirales | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Virología | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Tratamiento médico | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Sida | spa |
| dc.title | Two-Drug Regimens for HIV—Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges | spa |
| dc.type | journal article | spa |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Suárez_García_Microorganisms_2022.pdf
- Size:
- 1.03 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Versión del editor

