Possible link between the preferential unilateral chewing side and eruptive guidance of the maxillary canine germ : Cross-sectional study on panoramic radiographs

dc.contributor.authorTicona Flores, Jesús Miguel
dc.contributor.authorReichard Monefeldt, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorDiéguez Pérez, Montserrat
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-11T10:24:57Z
dc.date.available2025-01-11T10:24:57Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAim: To determine whether unilateral preferent chewing (UPC) affects the position and angulation of the permanent maxillary canine germ on the preferred side. Materials and methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional study, medical records from children 7.91(± 0.8) years old with unilateral preferred chewing side and unilateral posterior crossbite were selected. The position of the maxillary canines was analysed by measuring the following angles and distances: the angles formed between the canine axis and the midline (PS; potential impact range > 15°), and that between the canine axis and the bicondylar line (W; potential impact range < 75°). In addition, the canine's position with respect to the lateral incisor (EK; potential impact range > II) and the distance between the canine cusp and the occlusal plane (CCOP potential impact range > 10 mm) were measured. Results: The final sample consisted of 106 radiographs; thus, a total of 212 maxillary canines were analysed. Tooth angulation on the preferred chewing side was higher for the angle PS with an average angle of 13.88° (± 7.56) and its position was more frequently found in sector II (49.1%), according to the EK analysis, compared to its contralateral that had an average of 11.75° (± 10.13) for the PS angle and a frequency of 67% in the sector I (p < 0.05 in both analyses). The data obtained for the angle W resulted in an average of 76.12° (± 9.09), while on the contralateral side it was 77.16° (± 12.56; p = 0.012). Lastly, according to the CCOP analysis, the preferred chewing side measured on average 15.3 mm (± 2.4), while on the nonpreferred side it was 15.19 mm (± 2.43; p = 0.143). Conclusions: Based on this research, UPC seems to have a certain unfavourable influence on canine position and angulation. Thus, this is another factor to consider in decision-making regarding early treatment of this development disorder.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact1.3 Q3 JCR 2023spa
dc.description.impact0.658 Q1 SJR 2023
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2023
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationTicona-Flores, J. M., Reichard-Monefeldt, G., & Diéguez-Pérez, M. (2024). Possible link between the preferential unilateral chewing side and eruptive guidance of the maxillary canine germ: Cross-sectional study on panoramic radiographs. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 85(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00566-7spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00056-024-00566-7
dc.identifier.issn1615-6714
dc.identifier.issn1434-5293
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/13443
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00566-7spa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.subject.otherOdontopediatríaspa
dc.subject.sdgGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
dc.subject.unescoOdontologíaspa
dc.subject.unescoRadiografíaspa
dc.titlePossible link between the preferential unilateral chewing side and eruptive guidance of the maxillary canine germ : Cross-sectional study on panoramic radiographsspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication38454458-901c-4ea6-b803-e1b1d1801453
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery38454458-901c-4ea6-b803-e1b1d1801453

Files