Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA

dc.contributor.authorBoriani, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorMerino Llorens, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorWright, David J.
dc.contributor.authorGadler, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorSchaer, Beat
dc.contributor.authorLandolina, Maurizio
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-15T08:23:53Z
dc.date.available2019-03-15T08:23:53Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractIn recent years an extension of devices longevity has been obtained for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), including ICDs for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) through improved battery chemistry and device technology and this implies important clinical benefits (reduced need for device replacements and associated complications, particularly infections), as well as economic benefits, in line with patient preferences and needs. From a clinical point of view, the availability of this improvement in technology allows to better tune the choice of the device to be implanted, taking into account that the reasons supporting the value of an extended device longevity as a clinical priority may differ according to the clinical setting (purely electrical diseases or left ventricular dysfunction/heart failure, respectively). From an economic point of view, extension of device longevity may have an important impact in reducing long-term costs of device therapy, with substantial daily savings in favour of devices with extended longevity, up to 30%, depending on clinical scenarios. In studies based on projections, an extension of device longevity allowed to calculate that the cost per day of ICDs may be substantially reduced, and this allows to overcome the frequent perception of ICD and CRT-D devices as treatments with unaffordable costs and to overturn the misconception that up-front costs are the only metric with which to value device treatments. In view of its clinical and economic value, device longevity should be a determining factor in device choice by physicians and healthcare commissioners and should be appropriately considered and valued in comparative tenders.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact5.047 JCR (2018) Q1, 30/136 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systemsspa
dc.description.impact2.612 SJR (2018) Q1, 27/365 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 7/108 Physiology (medical)spa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2018spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationBoriani, G., Merino, J., Wright, D. J., Gadler, F., Schaer, B., & Landolina, M. (2018). Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA. Ep Europace, 20(12), 1882-1897. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy066spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/europace/euy066
dc.identifier.issn1099-5129
dc.identifier.issn1532-2092
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/7838
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemDesfibriladores cardioversores implantablesspa
dc.subject.uemObsolescencia del productospa
dc.subject.unescoTecnología médicaspa
dc.subject.unescoEnfermedad cardiovascularspa
dc.titleBattery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRAspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files