Comparative study of torsional and bending stress in NiTi, graphene, and GUM metal endodontic files by finite element analysis.
| dc.contributor.author | Díaz-Flores García, Víctor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pimienta Vázquez, María Isabel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tejedor Bautista, Beatriz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Suárez García, Ana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Freire Mancebo, Yolanda | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-08T12:48:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-08T12:48:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: This study investigates the behavior of graphene and GUM in terms of cyclic fatigue resistance and torsion through a finite element analysis on a file with an eccentric rectangular cross section and variable taper, and on a file with a centered triangular cross section, constant taper, and constant pitch. Methods: Root canals and endodontic files were created using Catia V5R21 software. For torsional analysis, the tip of the file was fixed at 1 and 3 mm, and a moment of 2.5 N-mm was generated at the handle. For the bending analysis in curved canals (45° and 60°), the handle was kept fixed and a force of 1 N was applied at the tip while the file was kept fixed at 9 mm. Results: GUM metal instruments showed better torsional resistance. On the other hand, NiTi and graphene performed better under the applied loads during flexion at 45° and 60°. Conclusion: GUM metal is emerging as a promising material in the field of endodontic instrument design due to its physical properties. | eng |
| dc.description.filiation | UEM | spa |
| dc.description.impact | 7.0 Q1 JCR 2023 | spa |
| dc.description.impact | 1.481 Q1 SJR 2023 | spa |
| dc.description.impact | No data IDR 2023 | spa |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Sin Financiación | spa |
| dc.identifier.citation | Díaz-Flores García, V., Pimienta Vázquez, M. I., Tejedor, B., Suárez, A., & Freire, Y. (2024). Comparative study of torsional and bending stress in NiTi, graphene, and GUM metal endodontic files by finite element analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 170, 108017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108017 | eng |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108017 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0010-4825 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11268/13124 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
| dc.peerreviewed | Si | spa |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108017 | spa |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | spa |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject.sdg | Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages | |
| dc.subject.unesco | Odontología | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Material sanitario | spa |
| dc.title | Comparative study of torsional and bending stress in NiTi, graphene, and GUM metal endodontic files by finite element analysis. | eng |
| dc.type | journal article | eng |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | ea1cf806-638f-4d14-947c-55c70f4071c0 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 4b864113-c8c8-4f5b-ac75-5422200ffc7c | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 5b4560dd-f76a-48c2-a526-0e7dc9183ed5 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ea1cf806-638f-4d14-947c-55c70f4071c0 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Suárez Gil_2024.pdf
- Size:
- 8.93 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:

