Accuracy of Area at Risk Quantification by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance According to the Myocardial Infarction Territory

dc.contributor.authorFernández Friera, Leticia
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Ruiz, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Álvarez, Ana
dc.contributor.authorFernández Jiménez, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorSánchez González, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRosselló, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorGómez Talavera, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorLópez Martín, Gonzalo J.
dc.contributor.authorPizarro, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorFuster, Valentín
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez Cabeza, Borja
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-04T11:34:49Z
dc.date.available2018-04-04T11:34:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Area at risk (AAR) quantification is important to evaluate the efficacy of cardioprotective therapies. However, postinfarction AAR assessment could be influenced by the infarcted coronary territory. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of T2-weighted short tau triple-inversion recovery (T2W-STIR) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for accurate AAR quantification in anterior, lateral, and inferior myocardial infarctions. METHODS: Acute reperfused myocardial infarction was experimentally induced in 12 pigs, with 40-minute occlusion of the left anterior descending (n = 4), left circumflex (n = 4), and right coronary arteries (n = 4). Perfusion CMR was performed during selective intracoronary gadolinium injection at the coronary occlusion site (in vivo criterion standard) and, additionally, a 7-day CMR, including T2W-STIR sequences, was performed. Finally, all animals were sacrificed and underwent postmortem Evans blue staining (classic criterion standard). RESULTS: The concordance between the CMR-based criterion standard and T2W-STIR to quantify AAR was high for anterior and inferior infarctions (r = 0.73; P = .001; mean error = 0.50%; limits = -12.68%-13.68% and r = 0.87; P = .001; mean error = -1.5%; limits = -8.0%-5.8%, respectively). Conversely, the correlation for the circumflex territories was poor (r = 0.21, P = .37), showing a higher mean error and wider limits of agreement. A strong correlation between pathology and the CMR-based criterion standard was observed (r = 0.84, P < .001; mean error = 0.91%; limits = -7.55%-9.37%). CONCLUSIONS: T2W-STIR CMR sequences are accurate to determine the AAR for anterior and inferior infarctions; however, their accuracy for lateral infarctions is poor. These findings may have important implications for the design and interpretation of clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of cardioprotective therapies.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact5.166 JCR (2017) Q1, 26/128 Cardiac and Cardiovacular Systemsspa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationFernández-Friera, L., García-Ruiz, J. M., García-Álvarez, A., Fernández-Jiménez, R., Sánchez-González, J., Rossello, X., ... & Ibáñez, B. (2017). Accuracy of area at risk quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance according to the myocardial infarction territory. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 70(5), 323-330. DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2016.07.004spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rec.2016.07.004
dc.identifier.issn0300-8932
dc.identifier.issn1579-2242
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/7176
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemCardiopatía isquémicaspa
dc.subject.uemInfarto de miocardiospa
dc.subject.unescoEnfermedad cardiovascularspa
dc.titleAccuracy of Area at Risk Quantification by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance According to the Myocardial Infarction Territoryspa
dc.title.alternativeImpacto del territorio miocárdico infartado en la cuantificación del área en riesgo mediante cardiorresonancia magnéticaspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd7955ca2-f5c0-4cac-9981-904be533e7cd
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd7955ca2-f5c0-4cac-9981-904be533e7cd

Files