Pooled Analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Abciximab in Smokers Versus Nonsmokers Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

dc.contributor.authorPiccolo, Raffaele
dc.contributor.authorGalasso, Gennaro
dc.contributor.authorEitel, Ingo
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Rodríguez, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorIversen, Allan Zeeberg
dc.contributor.authorGu, Youlan L.
dc.contributor.authorAbreu González, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorSmet, Bart J.G.L. de
dc.contributor.authorEsposito, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorWindecker, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorThiele, Holger
dc.contributor.authorPiscione, Federico
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-07T09:58:06Z
dc.date.available2017-12-07T09:58:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractCigarette smokers with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may present different response to potent antithrombotic therapy compared to nonsmokers. We assessed the impact of smoking status and intracoronary abciximab in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We pooled data from 5 randomized trials comparing intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab bolus in patients undergoing primary PCI. The primary end point was the composite of death or reinfarction at a mean follow-up of 292 ± 138 days. Of 3,158 participants, 1,369 (43.3%) were smokers, and they had a lower risk of the primary end point in crude, but not in adjusted analyses (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 1.21, p = 0.405). Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of primary end point among smokers (3.6% vs 8.0%; HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.72, p = 0.001), but not in nonsmokers (10.2% vs 9.9%; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.36, p = 0.96), with a significant interaction (p = 0.009). Furthermore, intracoronary abciximab decreased the risk of reinfarction in smokers (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.62, p = 0.001), with no difference in nonsmokers (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.01, p = 0.50). Stent thrombosis was lowered by intracoronary abciximab in smokers (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.66, p = 0.009), but was ineffective in nonsmokers (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.00, p = 0.903). Interaction testing showed heterogeneity in treatment effect for reinfarction (p = 0.002) and stent thrombosis (p = 0.018) according to smoking status. In conclusion, among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, smoking status did not affect the adjusted risk of clinical events. Intracoronary abciximab bolus improved clinical outcomes by reducing the risk of death or reinfarction.spa
dc.description.filiationUECspa
dc.description.impact3.398 JCR (2016) Q2, 47/126 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systemsspa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationPiccolo, R., Galasso, G., Eitel, I., Dominguez-Rodriguez, A., Iversen, A. Z., Gu, Y. L., ... & Thiele, H. (2016). Pooled Analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Abciximab in Smokers Versus Nonsmokers Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology, 118(12), 1798-1804.spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.068
dc.identifier.issn0002-9149
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/6827
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemCardiologíaspa
dc.subject.uemTabacospa
dc.subject.unescoEnfermedad cardiovascularspa
dc.subject.unescoTabacospa
dc.titlePooled Analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Abciximab in Smokers Versus Nonsmokers Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarctionspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcba8d216-6942-4a42-99c1-e6eaeee1f934
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycba8d216-6942-4a42-99c1-e6eaeee1f934

Files