Relationship Between Critical Power and Different Lactate Threshold Markers in Recreational Cyclists

dc.contributor.authorValenzuela Ruiz, Pedro Luis
dc.contributor.authorBrea Alejo, Lidia
dc.contributor.authorMontalvo Pérez, Almudena
dc.contributor.authorGil Cabrera, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorTalavera Fernández, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorLucía Mulas, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorBarranco Gil, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T18:25:48Z
dc.date.available2021-07-28T18:25:48Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To analyze the relationship between critical power (CP) and different lactate threshold (LT2) markers in cyclists. Methods: Seventeen male recreational cyclists [33 ± 5 years, peak power output (PO) = 4.5 ± 0.7 W/kg] were included in the study. The PO associated with four different fixed (onset of blood lactate accumulation) and individualized (Dmaxexp, Dmaxpol, and LTΔ1) LT2 markers was determined during a maximal incremental cycling test, and CP was calculated from three trials of 1-, 5-, and 20-min duration. The relationship and agreement between each LT2 marker and CP were then analyzed. Results: Strong correlations (r = 0.81-0.98 for all markers) and trivial-to-small non-significant differences (Hedges' g = 0.01-0.17, bias = 1-9 W, and p > 0.05) were found between all LT2 markers and CP with the exception of Dmaxexp, which showed the strongest correlation but was slightly higher than the CP (Hedges' g = 0.43, bias = 20 W, and p < 0.001). Wide limits of agreement (LoA) were, however, found for all LT2 markers compared with CP (from ±22 W for Dmaxexp to ±52 W for Dmaxpol), and unclear to most likely practically meaningful differences (PO differences between markers >1%, albeit <5%) were found between markers attending to magnitude-based inferences. Conclusion: LT2 markers show a strong association and overall trivial-to-small differences with CP. Nevertheless, given the wide LoA and the likelihood of potentially meaningful differences between these endurance-related markers, caution should be employed when using them interchangeably.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact4.755 JCR (2021) Q1, 20/81 Physiologyspa
dc.description.impact1.126 SJR (2021) Q1, 42/189 Physiologyspa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2021spa
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Economía de España y Competitividad y Fondos Feder (AL, subvención PI18 / 00139).spa
dc.identifier.citationValenzuela, P. L., Brea, L., Montalvo Pérez, A., Gil Cabrera, J., Talavera, E., Lucía, A., & Barranco Gil, D. (2021). Relationship Between Critical Power and Different Lactate Threshold Markers in Recreational Cyclists. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 676484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.676484spa
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2021.676484
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/10265
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.otherCiclismospa
dc.subject.otherResistencia fisicaspa
dc.subject.unescoDeportespa
dc.subject.unescoAtletaspa
dc.titleRelationship Between Critical Power and Different Lactate Threshold Markers in Recreational Cyclistsspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8c9501c2-c3f1-4a7e-aa0d-a971fab26e06
relation.isAuthorOfPublication654f3a98-4e22-49b8-8a40-1f737b4e87c9
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd3691359-d7bd-4a12-b84e-338e28c81f9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication68de99de-52a0-4d15-a265-0ae2b451167e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8c9501c2-c3f1-4a7e-aa0d-a971fab26e06

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lucía_fp_2021.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión del editor