ChatGPT performance in prosthodontics: Assessment of accuracy and repeatability in answer generation.

dc.contributor.authorFreire Mancebo, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorSantamaría Laorden, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorOrejas Pérez, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorGómez Sánchez, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Flores García, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorSuárez García, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T11:57:21Z
dc.date.available2024-10-08T11:57:21Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem The artificial intelligence (AI) software program ChatGPT is based on large language models (LLMs) and is widely accessible. However, in prosthodontics, little is known about its performance in generating answers. Purpose:The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of ChatGPT in generating answers about removable dental prostheses (RDPs) and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Material and methods: Thirty short questions were designed about RDPs and tooth-supported FDP, and 30 answers were generated for each of the questions using ChatGPT-4 in October 2023. The 900 generated answers were independently graded by experts using a 3-point Likert scale. The relative frequency and absolute percentage of answers were described. Accuracy was assessed using the Wald binomial method, while repeatability was evaluated using percentage agreement, Brennan and Prediger coefficient, Conger generalized Cohen kappa, Fleiss kappa, Gwet AC, and Krippendorff alpha methods. Confidence intervals were set at 95%. Statistical analysis was performed using the STATA software program. Results: The performance of ChatGPT in generating answers related to RDP and tooth-supported FDP was limited. The answers showed a reliability of 25.6%, with a confidence range between 22.9% and 28.6%. The repeatability ranged from substantial to moderate. Conclusions:The results show that currently ChatGPT has limited ability to generate answers related to RDPs and tooth-supported FDPs. Therefore, ChatGPT cannot replace a dentist, and, if professionals were to use it, they should be aware of its limitations.eng
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact4.3 Q1 JCR 2023spa
dc.description.impact1.177 Q1 SJR 2023spa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2023spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin Financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationFreire, Y., Santamaría Laorden, A., Orejas Pérez, J., Gómez Sánchez, M., Díaz-Flores García, V., & Suárez, A. (2024). ChatGPT performance in prosthodontics: Assessment of accuracy and repeatability in answer generation. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 131(4), 659.e1-659.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.018eng
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.018
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/13123
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.018spa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.sdgGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
dc.subject.unescoOdontologíaspa
dc.subject.unescoInteligencia artificialspa
dc.titleChatGPT performance in prosthodontics: Assessment of accuracy and repeatability in answer generation.eng
dc.typejournal articleeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa1efacd5-7be0-4c41-953a-0c0326dc64ad
relation.isAuthorOfPublication74d2eb56-d778-47c3-b338-76cd3d9e5f3c
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdba1665c-a621-4877-9c02-0b793b29330c
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationea1cf806-638f-4d14-947c-55c70f4071c0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5b4560dd-f76a-48c2-a526-0e7dc9183ed5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya1efacd5-7be0-4c41-953a-0c0326dc64ad

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Suárez Gil_2024.pdf
Size:
928.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: