Is trimodal therapy the current standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?

dc.contributor.authorLópez Valcárcel, Marta
dc.contributor.authorBarrado Los Arcos, Marta
dc.contributor.authorFerri Molina, María
dc.contributor.authorCienfuegos Belmonte, Irene
dc.contributor.authorDuque Santana, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorGajate Borau, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorFernández Ibiza, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Maestro, Mario
dc.contributor.authorCouñago Lorenzo, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorEt al.
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-16T12:05:03Z
dc.date.available2024-11-16T12:05:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence and future perspectives of bladder-sparing treatment for MIBC. Methods: A non-systematic literature search in Medline/Pubmed was performed in October 2023 with the following keywords "bladder cancer", "bladder-sparing", "trimodal therapy", "chemoradiation", "biomarkers", "immunotherapy", "neoadjuvant chemotherapy", "radiotherapy". Results: Urology guidelines recommend radical cystectomy as the standard curative treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer, reserving radiotherapy for patients who are unfit or who want to preserve their bladder. Given the morbidity and mortality of cystectomy and its impact on quality of life and bladder function, modern oncologic therapies are increasingly oriented toward organ preservation and maximizing functional outcomes while maintaining treatment efficacy. Trimodal therapy, which incorporates maximal transurethral resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy, is an effective regimen for bladder function preservation in well-selected patients. Despite the absence of comparative data from randomized trials, the two approaches seem to provide comparable oncologic outcomes. Studies are evaluating the expansion of eligibility criteria for trimodal therapy, the optimization of radiotherapy and immunotherapy delivery to further improve outcomes, and the validation of biomarkers to guide bladder preservation. Conclusions: Trimodal therapy has shown acceptable outcomes for bladder preservation; therefore, it provides a valid treatment option in well-selected patients.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact1.2 Q3 JCR 2023spa
dc.description.impact0.332 Q3 SJR 2023
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2023
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationLópez Valcárcel, M., Barrado Los Arcos, M., Ferri Molina, M., Cienfuegos Belmonte, I., Duque Santana, V., Gajate Borau, P., Fernández Ibiza, J., Álvarez Maestro, M., Sargos, P., López Campos, F., & Couñago, F. (2024). Is trimodal therapy the current standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?. Actas Urológicas Españolas, 48(5), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.04.001spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.04.001
dc.identifier.issn0210-4806
dc.identifier.issn1699-7980
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/13213
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.04.001spa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.otherVejiga urinariaspa
dc.subject.otherQuimioterapiaspa
dc.subject.sdgGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
dc.subject.unescoCáncerspa
dc.subject.unescoTerapiaspa
dc.titleIs trimodal therapy the current standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication116a6d00-95bc-49e5-a381-df10a08fde7a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2e374c15-a9f7-4137-99a8-6be419e2c462
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery116a6d00-95bc-49e5-a381-df10a08fde7a

Files