Comparison of the abdominal wall muscles thickness in female rugby players versus non-athletic women: A cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorAbuín Porras, Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorCueva Reguera, Mónica de la
dc.contributor.authorBenavides, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorÁvila, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorCruz Torres, Blanca de la
dc.contributor.authorPareja Galeano, Helios
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Morales, María
dc.contributor.authorRomero Morales, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-11T11:48:46Z
dc.date.available2020-05-11T11:48:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Rugby players engage in demanding, high loading muscular activity in the spine. Study of the abdominal wall architecture in female rugby athletes is relevant to the possible muscular asymmetry secondary to sport practice and the relationship between the abdominal wall and the pelvic floor muscles. Activation of the transversus abdominis (TrAb) generates an increase in the bladder neck muscle. Moreover, an increased interrecti distance (IRD) is related to urinary incontinence and has a higher prevalence in athletic women. The aim of the present study was to compare and quantify, with ultrasound imaging (USI), the thickness of the transversus abdominis (TrAb), external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), rectus abdominis (RA), and interrecti distance (IRD) in female rugby players versus non-athletic women in order to improve upon existing knowledge about abdominal wall configuration in female athletes. Materials and Methods: A sample of 32 women was recruited at the Universidad Europea Research Lab and divided in two groups: a rugby group (n = 16) and a non-athletic women group (n = 16). The thickness of the TrAb, EO, IO, RA, and IRD were assessed by USI in both groups. Results: There were statistically significant differences for the ultrasound evaluation thickness of the right TrAb (p = 0.011; d = 0.10), EO (p = 0.045; d = 0.74), IO (p = 0.003; d = 1.32), and RA (p = 0.001; d = 1.38) showing a thickness increase for the rugby group with respect to the control group. For the IRD thickness, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between groups. Conclusions: An increased TrAb, IO, EO, and RA thickness may be shown in female rugby players versus non-athletic women. Nevertheless, statistically relevant differences were not found for the IRD between both groups.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact2.430 JCR (2020) Q2, 80/169 Medicine, General & Internalspa
dc.description.impact0.530 SJR (2020) Q3, 1256/2448 Medicine (miscellaneous)spa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2019spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationAbuín-Porras, V., Cueva-Reguera, M. de la, Benavides-Morales, P., Ávila-Pérez, R., Cruz-Torres, B. de la, Pareja-Galeano, H., Blanco-Morales, M., & Romero-Morales, C. (2019). Comparison of the Abdominal Wall Muscle Thickness in Female Rugby Players Versus Non-Athletic Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medicina, 56(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56010008spa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/medicina56010008
dc.identifier.issn1010-660X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/8930
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.uemAbdomenspa
dc.subject.uemMúsculosspa
dc.subject.uemJugadores de rugbyspa
dc.subject.uemMujeresspa
dc.subject.unescoDeportespa
dc.subject.unescoMujerspa
dc.subject.unescoSaludspa
dc.titleComparison of the abdominal wall muscles thickness in female rugby players versus non-athletic women: A cross-sectional studyspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0a34e108-6aec-4009-acc2-1dea637edad5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication95b6ec06-3a66-40ca-a273-dd8e15dbe320
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb96ef663-e66a-43f3-be8d-f182fa025510
relation.isAuthorOfPublication976417fb-2659-472c-b394-e26bfdffe21d
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf7e55b2b-699c-4e9e-b57a-d4faaee07ffe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0a34e108-6aec-4009-acc2-1dea637edad5

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Medicina_2020_56_1_8.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión del editor