Safety of sacubitril/valsartan initiated during hospitalization: Data from a non‐selected cohort

dc.contributor.authorLópez Azor, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorVicent, Lourdes
dc.contributor.authorValero Masa, María Jesús
dc.contributor.authorEsteban Fernández, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorGómez Bueno, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorPérez, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorDíez Villanueva, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorJuan Bagudá, Javier de
dc.contributor.authorManuel Iniesta, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Sellés Oliveria Soares, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorEt al.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-24T20:23:48Z
dc.date.available2020-03-24T20:23:48Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractAims Sacubitril/valsartan is safe when initiated during hospitalization in a clinical trial setting. Its safety in real‐life population is not stablished. We compared the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization in a non‐selected population, in the PIONEER‐HF trial, and in non‐selected outpatients. Methods and results Multicentre registry included 527 patients: 100 were started on sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization (19.0%) and 427 as outpatients (81.0%). Compared with those in the pivotal trial, inpatients in our cohort were older (71 ± 12 vs. 61 ± 14 years; P < 0.001); had more frequently Functional Class II (41 [41.0%] vs. 100 [22.7%]; P < 0.001), higher levels of N‐terminal pro‐B type natriuretic peptide (4044 [1630–8680] vs. 2013 [1002–4132] pg/mL; P < 0.001), better glomerular filtration rate (63.5 [51.0–80.0] vs. 58.4 [47.5–71.5] mL/min; P = 0.01), and higher systolic blood pressure (121 [110–136] vs. 118 [110–133] mmHg; P = 0.03); and received angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers more frequently (92 [92.0%] vs. 208 [52.7%]; P < 0.001). Compared with non‐selected outpatients, inpatients were older (71 ± 12 vs. 68 ± 12 years, P = 0.02), had more frequent Functional Class III–IV (58 [58.0%] vs. 129 [30.3%], P < 0.001), had higher levels of N‐terminal pro‐B type natriuretic peptide (4044 [1630–8680] vs. 2182 [1134–4172]; P < 0.001), and were receiving angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers target dose less frequently (55 [55.0%] vs. 335 [78.5%]; P < 0.001). They also started sacubitril/valsartan with a low dose (50 mg/12 h) more frequently (80 [80.0%] vs. 209 [48.8%], P < 0.001). The initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in outpatients was an independent predictor of high‐dose use (OR 3.1; 95% confidence interval 1.7–5.6, P < 0.001). The follow‐up time in both cohorts, including all patients enrolled, was similar (7.0 ± 0.1 vs. 7.2 ± 2.6 months, P = 0.72). All‐cause admissions during follow‐up were more frequent in inpatients (30 [30.0%] vs. 68 outpatients [15.9%], P = 0.001), with no relevant differences in all‐cause mortality. There was no significant difference in sacubitril/valsartan withdrawal rate (17 inpatients [17.0%] vs. 49 outpatients [11.5%], P = 0.13). The incidence of adverse effects was also similar: hypotension (16 inpatients [16.0%] vs. 71 outpatients [16.7%], P = 0.88), worsening renal function (7 inpatients [7.0%] vs. 29 outpatients [6.8%], P = 0.94), and hyperkalaemia (1 inpatient [1.0%] vs. 21 outpatients [4.9%], P = 0.09). We did not register any case of angioedema. Conclusions It is safe to initiate sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization in daily clinical practice. Inpatients have a higher risk profile and receive low starting doses more frequently than outpatients.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact3.902 JCR (2019) Q2, 44/138 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systemsspa
dc.description.impact0.640 SJR (2019) Q2, 145/362 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicinespa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2019spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationLópez‐Azor, J. C., Vicent, L., Valero‐Masa, M. J., Esteban‐Fernández, A., Gómez‐Bueno, M., Pérez, Á., Díez‐Villanueva, P., Juan, J. de, Manuel‐Iniesta, Á., Bover, R., Prado, S., & Martínez‐Sellés, M. (2019). Safety of sacubitril/valsartan initiated during hospitalization: Data from a non‐selected cohort. ESC Heart Failure, 6(6), 1161–1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12527spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ehf2.12527
dc.identifier.issn2055-5822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/8839
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://ezproxy.universidadeuropea.es/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12527spa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemHospitalesspa
dc.subject.uemEnfermos cardíacosspa
dc.subject.uemMedicamentos cardiovascularesspa
dc.subject.unescoHospitalspa
dc.subject.unescoEnfermedad cardiovascularspa
dc.subject.unescoMedicamentospa
dc.titleSafety of sacubitril/valsartan initiated during hospitalization: Data from a non‐selected cohortspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication713e6276-e112-4373-8760-aa719af244e3
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa14a4cbe-6878-47e7-8b7b-ffdd4a82573a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery713e6276-e112-4373-8760-aa719af244e3

Files