Performing a urine dipstick test with a clean-catch urine sample is an accurate screening method for urinary tract infections in young infants

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Tagarro García, Alfredo
García-Pose, Araceli
Sánchez, Aida
Cañete Díaz, Alfonso

Advisors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Metrics

Google Scholar

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

AIM: This study evaluated using urine dipstick tests with the clean-catch method to screen for urinary tract infection (UTI) in febrile infants under 90 days of age. METHODS: We carried out a comparative diagnostic accuracy study of infants under 90 days old, who were studied for unexplained fever without any source, in the emergency room of a hospital in Madrid from January 2011 to January 2013. We obtained matched samples of urine using two different methods: a clean-catch, standardised stimulation technique and catheterisation collection. The results of the leucocyte esterase test and nitrite test were compared with their urine cultures. RESULTS: We obtained 60 pairs of matched samples. A combined analysis of leukocyte esterase and, or, nitrites yielded a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 80% for the diagnosis of UTIs in clean-catch samples. The sensitivity of leukocyte esterase and, or, nitrites in samples obtained by catheterisation were not statistically different to the clean-catch samples (p = 0.592). CONCLUSION: Performing urine dipstick tests using urine samples obtained by the clean-catch method was an accurate screening test for diagnosing UTIs in febrile infants of less than 90 days old. This provided a good alternative to bladder catheterisation when screening for UTIs.

Description

Keywords

Bibliographic reference

Herreros, M. L., Tagarro, A., García‐Pose, A., Sánchez, A., Cañete, A., & Gili, P. (2018). Performing a urine dipstick test with a clean‐catch urine sample is an accurate screening method for urinary tract infections in young infants. Acta Paediatrica, 107(1), 145-150. DOI: 10.1111/apa.14090

Type of document