Gender Differences of University Students in the Online Teaching Quality and Psychological Profile during the COVID-19 Pandemic

dc.contributor.authorSato, Simone Nomie
dc.contributor.authorCondés Moreno, Emilia
dc.contributor.authorRico Villanueva, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorChiarella, Pascual
dc.contributor.authorTornero Aguilera, José Francisco
dc.contributor.authorBeltrán Velasco, Ana Isabel
dc.contributor.authorClemente Suárez, Vicente Javier
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-04T10:12:01Z
dc.date.available2024-12-04T10:12:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractWith the arrival of COVID-19, educational systems have had to adapt to the social and health situation immediately. This led to the appearance of the asynchronous teaching model. Throughout the pandemic, at the educational level, we can distinguish three phases, eminently online, hybrid, and finally, face-to-face. However, the perception of educational quality in these three educational moments, taking into account the psychometric profile and gender, has not been studied. Thus, 1093 university students from Ibero-American countries were analyzed. Through a questionnaire, demographic, academic, and psychological variables were analyzed at three moments during the evolution of the pandemic. Data suggest that, during the lockdown phase, while teaching was eminently online, students presented higher levels of stress and higher difficulty of learning; class attendance, convenience, preferred method of learning, grading score, and motivation were lower, compared to other phases of teaching (hybrid and face-to-face). During this period, females presented higher stress levels than males, as well as higher levels of anxiety and loneliness, without gender differences among the other studied variables. During the hybrid and face-to-face phases, male students presented higher values in the results of difficulty learning and demanding activities. No differences were seen regarding motivation, synchronous class attendance, learning level, grades, convenience, or preferred learning method. The results from the present study suggest that, despite the effect of the pandemic on mental health, asynchronous education is postulated as an effective teaching–learning alternative. Yet, a special focus should be given to female students.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impactNo data JCR 2022spa
dc.description.impact0.828 Q2 SJR 2022spa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2022spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationSato, S. N., Condés Moreno, E., Villanueva, A. R., Chiarella, P., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., Beltrán-Velasco, A. I., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2022). Gender Differences of University Students in the Online Teaching Quality and Psychological Profile during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214729spa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph192214729
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/13291
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214729spa
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19spa
dc.subject.unescoAprendizaje en líneaspa
dc.subject.unescoSalud mentalspa
dc.subject.unescoEnseñanza superiorspa
dc.titleGender Differences of University Students in the Online Teaching Quality and Psychological Profile during the COVID-19 Pandemicspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationadd36d97-9c9a-41d8-91f2-5aee4000b5f9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication20d7ed6e-e9e5-4056-8372-a9631a99ced0
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa2e25626-16b1-41bc-9c67-8de8ce6e007d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryadd36d97-9c9a-41d8-91f2-5aee4000b5f9

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijerph-19-14729.pdf
Size:
362.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión del editor