Light disturbance analysis in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight Assessment Study Spain (MASS)

dc.contributor.authorRuiz Pomeda, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorAmorim de Sousa, Ana
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Méijome, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Garrido, Francisco Luis
dc.contributor.authorPérez Sánchez, Belén
dc.contributor.authorVilla Collar, César
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-20T11:19:01Z
dc.date.available2019-03-20T11:19:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate the perception of light disturbances (LD) in children wearing Dual Focus (DF) MiSight® contact lenses (CLs) for myopia control compared with children wearing single vision spectacles (SV). Methods This was a randomized, controlled clinical trial involving subjects aged 8–12 with myopia of -0.75 to -4.00D and astigmatism <1.00D allocated to MiSight® study CLs group or control group wearing SV. LD was determined at baseline, 12 and 24 months visit with a validated device, Light Disturbance Analyzer (LDA) to determine the shape, size and regularity of the LD phenomena with parameters of Light Disturbance Index (LDI) Best Fit Circle (BFC) and Standard Deviation between LD and BFC (BFCIrreg.SD). Results 74 children completed the study, 41 in the CL group and 33 in the SV group. SV group didn´t show any significant differences between monocular and binocular LD measurements throughout the study. Binocular BFCRadius was smaller at 24 months visit compared with 12 month visit (p < 0.05) and for BFCIrreg.SD was significantly smaller at 24 month visit compared with baseline (p < 0.05). In MiSight® group, binocular and monocular LDI, BFCRadius and BFCIrreg.SD measurements didn’t show any significant change between 12 and 24 month visits (p > 0.05). However, monocular BFCIrreg. as well as monocular and binocular BFCIrreg.SD showed a significant decrease at 24 month visit compared with 12 month visit. Conclusions DF lenses increase the monocular light disturbance perception compared with a single vision spectacle correction. However, this effect decreased over the follow-up time and presented a significant binocular attenuation effect.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact2.578 JCR (2019) Q2, 20/60 Ophtalmologyspa
dc.description.impact0.915 SJR (2019) Q1, 2/12 Optometry, 608/2754 Medicine (miscellaneous); Q2, 33/124 Ophthalmologyspa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2019spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationRuiz-Pomeda, A., Fernandes, P., Amorim-de-Sousa, A., González-Méijome, J. M., Prieto-Garrido, F. L., Pérez-Sánchez, B., & Villa-Collar, C. (2019). Light disturbance analysis in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight® Assessment Study Spain (MASS). Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 42(2), 200-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2018.11.006spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clae.2018.11.006
dc.identifier.issn1367-0484
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/7850
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemLentes de contactospa
dc.subject.uemNiñosspa
dc.subject.unescoÓpticaspa
dc.subject.unescoNiñospa
dc.titleLight disturbance analysis in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight Assessment Study Spain (MASS)spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione6c9c176-1681-4446-9c90-d684b859e569
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione19cbc49-41e7-4085-8afe-3e6d6a1608eb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye6c9c176-1681-4446-9c90-d684b859e569

Files