Real-World Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Women and Men With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Meta-analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Nuechterlein, Kaitlin
AlTurki, Ahmed
Ni, Jiayi
Martens, Pieter

Advisors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Metrics

Google Scholar

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) is a novel and effective therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Despite several sex-specific particularities that may influence drug effects, there has been no prior study evaluating the safety of SV in women with HFrEF in the "real-world." Methods: We performed a literature search to identify observational studies evaluating SV. We contacted all authors to obtain sex-specific data on major adverse outcomes. We compared all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) deaths, heart failure hospitalizations, hyperkalemia, and hypotension in men and women. Results: We identified five cohort studies enrolling 8,981 patients; 6,092 men (67.8%) and 2,889 women (32.2%). The mean age was 67 years in both sexes. The rates for all-cause mortality, CV mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, hypotension, and hyperkalemia were similar between women and men. Although the unadjusted aggregate rates of all-cause and CV mortalities were numerically higher in men than in women, these differences did not reach statistical differences. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed similar rates of major adverse events in men and women with HFrEF treated with SV. Larger observational studies with longer duration and a higher number of women are needed to confirm the long-term safety of SV in women in the clinical practice.

Description

Keywords

Bibliographic reference

Nuechterlein, K., AlTurki, A., Ni, J., Martínez-Sellés, M., Martens, P., Russo, V., Backelin, C. N., & Huynh, T. (2021). Real-World Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Women and Men With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Meta-analysis. CJC Open, 3(12), S202-S208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.009

Type of document