Comparative Effects of One-Shot Electrical Stimulation on Performance of the Flexor Hallucis Longus Muscle in Professional Dancers: Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous?

dc.contributor.authorCruz Torres, Blanca de la
dc.contributor.authorBarrera García-Martín, Irene
dc.contributor.authorRomero Morales, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-30T09:06:56Z
dc.date.available2022-04-30T09:06:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjective High demand of flexor hallucis longus (FHL) in the positions of extreme flexion of the ankle and toes is required in the dance. The aim was to investigate the effects of single-shot of ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation (PNM) vs. single-shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in performance of the FHL muscle in professional dancers. Materials and Methods Thirty-two female healthy dancers were divided into two groups: TENS group and PNM group. The stimulation interventions consisted in the application of a square wave biphasic electrical current for a total of 1.5 mins. Range of motion (ROM) of first metatarsophalangeal joint, balance test, and unilateral heel raise fatigue test were performed in dominance limb. Results There were no differences between both groups in the baseline measurements. Compared to their baseline values, the TENS group statistically improved balance (p < 0.01, d = 0.6), ROM (p < 0.001, d = 0.3), and endurance (p = 0.04, d = 0.5). The PNM group only statistically improved balance and endurance (p < 0.001), with a large effect size for both test (d = 0.8 and d = 2.24, respectively). After interventions, there were no significant differences between TENS and PNM groups for all variables. However, PNM was qualitatively more effective because the percentage change in mean was greater and effect size was large for the balance test and endurance test. Conclusions Simple single-shot procedure with percutaneous or TENS provided immediate performance improvement of FHL muscle in dancers, being PNM the more effective intervention.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact4.722 JCR (2020) Q2, 54/208 Clinical Neurologyspa
dc.description.impact1.296 SJR (2020) Q1, 17/122 Anesthesiology and Pain Medicinespa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2020spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationCruz Torres, B., Barrera‐García‐Martín, I., & Romero‐Morales, C. (2020). Comparative Effects of One‐Shot Electrical Stimulation on Performance of the Flexor Hallucis Longus Muscle in Professional Dancers: Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous? Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 23(6), 865–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13040spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ner.13040
dc.identifier.issn1094-7159
dc.identifier.issn1525-1403
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/11180
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://ezproxy.universidadeuropea.es/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13040spa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.otherMúsculo lisospa
dc.subject.unescoSistema cardiovascularspa
dc.subject.unescoBailarínspa
dc.subject.unescoEnseñanza profesionalspa
dc.titleComparative Effects of One-Shot Electrical Stimulation on Performance of the Flexor Hallucis Longus Muscle in Professional Dancers: Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous?spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf7e55b2b-699c-4e9e-b57a-d4faaee07ffe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf7e55b2b-699c-4e9e-b57a-d4faaee07ffe

Files