Differences in disinfection protocols for root canal treatments between general dentists and endodontists: A Web-based survey

dc.contributor.authorGregorio González, César de
dc.contributor.authorArias Paniagua, Ana María
dc.contributor.authorNavarrete Marabini, Natalia María
dc.contributor.authorCisneros Cabello, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorCohenca, Néstor
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-17T15:48:37Z
dc.date.available2020-03-17T15:48:37Z
dc.date.embargoEndDate2100-01-01
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractBackground The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences exist in disinfection protocols between endodontists and general dentists. Methods The authors sent an invitation to participate in a Web-based survey to 950 dentists affiliated with the Spanish Board of Dentistry. Participants responded to 9 questions about irrigation protocols and other factors related to disinfection during root canal therapy. Results A total of 238 (25.05%) study participants successfully completed and returned the surveys. Among these participants, 50% were general dentists and 50% were endodontists. The authors found no statistically significant differences in respondents’ first choice of an irrigant solution (that is, sodium hypochlorite), but they noted statistically significant differences in the protocols used by general dentists and by endodontists in relation to the concentration of sodium hypochlorite (P = .0003), the use and type of irrigant used to remove the smear layer (P = 5.39 × 10−10), the use of adjuncts to irrigation (P = 5.98 × 10−8), the enlargement of the apical preparation when shaping a necrotic tooth (P = .001), and the maintenance of apical patency throughout the debridement and shaping procedure (P = .04). Conclusions General dentists and endodontists embrace different disinfection protocols. The results of the survey demonstrated that endodontists keep up to date with protocols published in the literature, whereas general dentists use protocols learned during their dental training. Both groups of clinicians should be aware of the importance of disinfection techniques and their relationship to treatment outcomes. Practical Implications Controlling microorganisms during a root canal treatment, especially in cases with necrotic pulp, is essential to improve treatment outcomes. Clinicians should update their protocols and also consider referring patients to a specialist when their protocols are based on traditional techniques, especially in those cases with necrotic pulp.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact1.767 JCR (2015) Q2, 27/91 Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicinespa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationGregorio González, C., Arias, A., Navarrete Marabini, N., Cisneros Cabello, R., & Cohenca, N. (2015). Differences in disinfection protocols for root canal treatments between general dentists and endodontists: A Web-based survey. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 146(7), 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.01.027spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.adaj.2015.01.027
dc.identifier.issn0002-8177
dc.identifier.issn1943-4723
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/8784
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemOdontologíaspa
dc.subject.uemProtocolos médicosspa
dc.subject.unescoOdontologíaspa
dc.subject.unescoEvaluación comparativaspa
dc.subject.unescoMétodo de evaluaciónspa
dc.titleDifferences in disinfection protocols for root canal treatments between general dentists and endodontists: A Web-based surveyspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationec67a8a4-6cfe-40a4-a8c7-922a6e79d21d
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione189b0c5-3801-4134-81cd-0fa0365981e5
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcf04f961-7e2b-4102-9e1f-b5e00ed3fefb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryec67a8a4-6cfe-40a4-a8c7-922a6e79d21d

Files