Intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves functional capacity and muscle strength in people receiving haemodialysis: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorValenzuela Ruiz, Pedro Luis
dc.contributor.authorMorales Rojas, Javier Salvador
dc.contributor.authorRuilope Urioste, Luis Miguel
dc.contributor.authorVilla Polo, Pedro de la
dc.contributor.authorSantos Lozano, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorLucía Mulas, Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T07:44:17Z
dc.date.available2020-10-14T07:44:17Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractDoes neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) applied during haemodialysis sessions improve functional capacity in people with end-stage renal disease? Does NMES used in this way also improve muscle strength, muscle mass/architecture, psychological outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes and biochemical variables? Does it have any adverse effects? Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to 15 October 2019. Participants Patients receiving haemodialysis for end-stage renal disease. Intervention NMES administered during haemodialysis sessions versus control. Outcomes measures Functional capacity, muscle strength, muscle mass, psychological outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, biochemical variables and adverse events. Data analysis Data were meta-analysed where possible and results were expressed as the pooled mean difference between groups with a 95% confidence interval. Results Eight studies (221 patients) were included in the analysis. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was fair to good. NMES improved functional capacity as assessed by the 6-minute walk distance test (MD 31 m, 95% CI 13 to 49) and peak workload attained in incremental exercise (MD 12.5 W, 95% CI 3.2 to 21.9). NMES increased knee extensor muscle strength (MD 3.5 kg, 95% CI 2.3 to 4.7) and handgrip strength (MD 2.4 kg, 95% CI 0.4 to 4.4). Muscle mass/architecture was not substantially affected. NMES was estimated to be beneficial for several domains of quality of life in several studies, although most of these estimates were imprecise. No benefits were found for cardiovascular outcomes. The available data did not establish any clear effects on cardiovascular outcomes or biochemical variables (dialysis efficiency, urea and creatinine). No major NMES-related adverse events were observed. Conclusions NMES is safe, practical and effective for improving functional capacity and muscle strength in haemodialysis patients. Further research is needed to confirm the clinical relevance of these findings.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact7.000 JCR (2020) Q1, 1/82 Orthopedicsspa
dc.description.impact1.615 SJR (2020) Q1, 11/210 Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitationspa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2020spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationValenzuela, P. L., Morales, J. S., Ruilope, L. M., Villa, P., Santos, A., & Lucia, A. (2020). Intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves functional capacity and muscle strength in people receiving haemodialysis: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 66(2), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2020.03.006spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jphys.2020.03.006
dc.identifier.issn1836-9553
dc.identifier.issn1836-9561
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/9143
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.uemEstimulación eléctricaspa
dc.subject.uemHemodiálisisspa
dc.subject.uemFisioterapiaspa
dc.subject.unescoTratamiento médicospa
dc.subject.unescoTerapiaspa
dc.subject.unescoTecnología médicaspa
dc.titleIntradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves functional capacity and muscle strength in people receiving haemodialysis: a systematic reviewspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb3782a9a-d773-401b-99b3-38488ac0cf1a
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd3691359-d7bd-4a12-b84e-338e28c81f9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb3782a9a-d773-401b-99b3-38488ac0cf1a

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Journal_of_Physiotherapy_2020_66(2)_89-96.pdf
Size:
517.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión del editor