Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Chapman, Mark
Tomkins, Sam Damian
Triplett, Travis N.

Advisors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Metrics

Google Scholar

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

To investigate the ability of the OMNI-RES (0–10) scale to estimate velocity and loading changes during sets to failure in the hang power clean (HPC) exercise. Eleven recreationally resistance-trained males (28.5 ± 3.5 years) with an average one-repetition maximum (1RM) value of 1.1 ± 0.07 kg body mass-1 in HPC, were assessed on five separate days with 48 hours of rest between sessions. After determining the 1RM value, participants performed four sets to self-determined failure with the following relative loading ranges: 60% < 70%, 70 < 80%, 80 < 90% and > 90%. The peak vertical velocity (PVV), and Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) were measured for every repetition of each set. The RPE expressed after the first repetition (RPE-1) and when the highest value of PVV was achieved during the set (RPE-max) were similar and significantly lower than the RPE associated with a 5% (RPE-5%) and 10% (RPE-10%) drop in PVV. In addition, the RPE produced at failure was similar to RPE-5% only for the heaviest range (≥ 90%). Furthermore, RPE-1 was useful to distinguish loading zones between the four assessed ranges (60 < 70%, vs. 70 < 80%, vs. 80 < 90%, vs. ≥ 90%). The RPE seems to be useful to identify PVV changes (maximal, 5% and 10% drop) during continuous sets to self-determined failure and to distinguish 10% loading zone increments, from 60 to 100% of 1RM in the HPC exercise.

Description

Keywords

Bibliographic reference

Chapman, M., Damian Tomkins, S., N Triplett, T., Larumbe-Zabala, E., & Naclerio, F. (2022). Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements. Biology of Sport, 39(3), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.106156

Type of document

Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional

La licencia de este ítem se describe como Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional