Novel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve

dc.contributor.authorZourdos, Michael C.
dc.contributor.authorKlemp, Alex
dc.contributor.authorDolan, Chad
dc.contributor.authorQuiles, Justin M.
dc.contributor.authorSchau, Kyle A.
dc.contributor.authorJo, Edward
dc.contributor.authorHelms, Eric
dc.contributor.authorEsgro, Ben
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Scott
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Merino, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Rocky
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-02T12:09:30Z
dc.date.available2016-11-02T12:09:30Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe primary aim of this study was to compare rating of perceived exertion (RPE) values measuring repetitions in reserve (RIR) at particular intensities of 1 repetition maximum (RM) in experienced (ES) and novice squatters (NS). Furthermore, this investigation compared average velocity between ES and NS at the same intensities. Twenty-nine individuals (24.0 ± 3.4 years) performed a 1RM squat followed by a single repetition with loads corresponding to 60, 75, and 90% of 1RM and an 8-repetition set at 70% 1RM. Average velocity was recorded at 60, 75, and 90% 1RM and on the first and last repetitions of the 8-repetition set. Subjects reported an RPE value that corresponded to an RIR value (RPE-10 = 0-RIR, RPE-9 = 1-RIR, and so forth). Subjects were assigned to one of the 2 groups: (a) ES (n = 15, training age: 5.2 ± 3.5 years) and (b) NS (n = 14, training age: 0.4 ± 0.6 years). The mean of the average velocities for ES was slower (p ≤ 0.05) than NS at 100% and 90% 1RM. However, there were no differences (p > 0.05) between groups at 60, 75%, or for the first and eighth repetitions at 70% 1RM. In addition, ES recorded greater RPE at 1RM than NS (p = 0.023). In ES, there was a strong inverse relationship between average velocity and RPE at all percentages (r = −0.88, p < 0.001), and a strong inverse correlation in NS between average velocity and RPE at all intensities (r = −0.77, p = 0.001). Our findings demonstrate an inverse relationship between average velocity and RPE/RIR. Experienced squatter group exhibited slower average velocity and higher RPE at 1RM than NS, signaling greater efficiency at high intensities. The RIR-based RPE scale is a practical method to regulate daily training load and provide feedback during a 1RM test.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact2.060 JCR (2016) Q2, 28/81 Sport Sciencesspa
dc.description.impact1.354 SJR (2016) Q1, 348/2886 Medicine (miscellaneous), 30/280 Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 15/195 Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 28/127 Sports Sciencespa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2016spa
dc.description.sponsorshipFlorida Atlantic Universityspa
dc.identifier.citationZourdos, M. C., Klemp, A., Dolan, C., Quiles, J. M., Schau, K. A., Jo, E., ... & Blanco, R. (2016). Novel Resistance Training–Specific Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale Measuring Repetitions in Reserve. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(1), 267-275.spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000001049
dc.identifier.issn10648011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/5960
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.subject.uemEntrenamiento deportivospa
dc.subject.uemCondición físicaspa
dc.subject.unescoDeportespa
dc.titleNovel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reservespa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0c055c4d-8c49-467b-8819-950ad40f5e67
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0c055c4d-8c49-467b-8819-950ad40f5e67

Files

Collections