Tratamiento de la estenosis de uréter distal mediante reimplantación urétero-vesical laparoscópica

dc.contributor.authorNúñez-Mora, Carlosspa
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Mediero, José Maríaspa
dc.contributor.authorCabrera Castillo, Pedro Manuel
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Emiliospa
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Tello, Ana
dc.contributor.authorAngulo Cuesta, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-27T17:26:39Z
dc.date.available2013-11-27T17:26:39Z
dc.date.issued2011spa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: to analyse the results achieved to treat iliac or pelvic ureteric stricture using laparoscopic reimplantation of the ureter in a psoic bladder. Material and method: in a four-year period, we performed laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in a psoic bladder in 6 patients (right/left 1:1; male/female 1:2; mean age 59.2 years, range 47-87). In 4 cases the lesion was iatrogenic and in 2 cases idiopathic. Ureteral resection with bladder cuff and cystorraphy followed by ipsilateral lymph node dissection was performed in idiopathic cases or those with history of previous urothelial tumour (4 cases in total) before ureteral reimplantation. Bladder was extensively mobilized and fixed to minor psoas tendon before performing ureteroneocystostomy. Mixed intra and extravesical technique with submucosal tunnel (Politano) was used in a case and in the remaining 5 cases extravesical technique with submucosal tunnel (Goodwin) was used. Mean follow-up was 26 months (range 18-34). Results: there was no need to convert to open surgery. Time of surgery was 230 minutes in the case treated with Politano ureteroneocystostomy and 120 (range 75-150) in those treated purely extravesically. The mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 2-5). There were no intra or postoperative complications. Histologic assessment always revealed ureteral fibrosis and in 2 cases accompanying granulomatous inflammation and dysplasia. No patient suffered re-stricture or impairment in renal function during follow-up. Conclusions: laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is an effective and safe minimally invasive technique to treat benign distal stricture of the ureter. Simplicity of extravesical reimplantation has an advantage over its intravesical counterpart. (C) 2010 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.spa
dc.description.impact0.455 JCR (2011) Q4, 67/73 Urology & nephrologyspa
dc.identifier.citationNúñez-Mora, C., García-Mediero, J. M., Cabrera-Castillo, P. M., Hernández, E., García-Tello, A., & Angulo-Cuesta, J. (2011). Treatment of distal ureteral stricture by laparoscopic ureterovesical reimplantation. Actas Urológicas Españolas, 35(1), 31-36.spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acuro.2010.10.001spa
dc.identifier.issn02104806spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/925
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessen
dc.subject.otherUreteric Stricturespa
dc.subject.otherLaparoscopyspa
dc.subject.otherReconstructive Surgeryspa
dc.subject.otherVesicoureteral Refluxspa
dc.subject.otherBoari Flapspa
dc.subject.otherUreteroneocystostomyspa
dc.subject.otherTrigonoplastyspa
dc.subject.otherExperiencespa
dc.subject.otherManagementspa
dc.subject.otherInjuriesspa
dc.subject.otherHitchspa
dc.subject.otherUrology & Nephrologyspa
dc.subject.unescoEnfermedadspa
dc.subject.unescoTratamiento médicospa
dc.subject.unescoCirugíaspa
dc.titleTratamiento de la estenosis de uréter distal mediante reimplantación urétero-vesical laparoscópicaspa
dc.title.alternativeTreatment of distal ureteral stricture by laparoscopic ureterovesical reimplantationspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0cb6a24b-c133-4a5d-a049-410cb608ce65
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3a23b48b-ef80-4b0a-bb2d-df1f4c4a50ae
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationeaadbb3a-67c4-43f5-b477-5fb2318b809a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0cb6a24b-c133-4a5d-a049-410cb608ce65

Files