Functional Threshold Power: Relationship With Respiratory Compensation Point and Effects of Various Warm-Up Protocols

dc.contributor.authorBarranco Gil, David
dc.contributor.authorGil Cabrera, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela Ruiz, Pedro Luis
dc.contributor.authorBrea Alejo, Lidia
dc.contributor.authorMontalvo Pérez, Almudena
dc.contributor.authorTalavera Fernández, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorMoral González, Susana
dc.contributor.authorLucía Mulas, Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-17T15:01:57Z
dc.date.available2020-10-17T15:01:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The functional threshold power (FTP), which demarcates the transition from steady state to non-steady-state oxidative metabolism, is usually determined with a 20-minute cycling time trial that follows a standard ∼45-minute warm-up. This study aimed to determine if the standard warm-up inherent to FTP determination is actually necessary and how its modification or removal affects the relationship between FTP and the respiratory compensation point (RCP). Methods: A total of 15 male cyclists (age 35 [9] y, maximum oxygen uptake 66.4 [6.8] mL·kg−1·min−1) participated in this randomized, crossover study. Participants performed a ramp test for determination of RCP and maximum oxygen uptake. During subsequent visits, they performed a 20-minute time trial preceded by the “standard” warm-up that is typically performed before an FTP test (S-WU), a 10-minute warm-up at the power output (PO) corresponding to 60% of maximum oxygen uptake (60%-WU), or no warm-up (No-WU). FTP was computed as 95% of the mean PO attained during the time trial. Results: Although the FTP was correlated with the RCP independently of the warm-up (r = .89, .93, and .86 for No-WU, 60%-WU, and S-WU, respectively; all Ps < .001), the PO at RCP was higher than the FTP in all cases (bias ± 95% limits of agreement = 57 [24], 60 [23], and 57 [32] W for No-WU, 60%-WU, and S-WU, respectively; all Ps < .001 and effect size > 1.70). Conclusions: The FTP is highly correlated with the RCP but corresponds to a significantly lower PO, being these results independent of the warm-up performed (or even with no warm-up).spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact4.010 JCR (2020) Q1, 22/88 Sport Sciencesspa
dc.description.impact2.278 SJR (2020) Q1, 8/288 Orthopedics and Sports Medicinespa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2019spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationBarranco-Gil, D., Gil-Cabrera, J., Valenzuela, P. L., Brea Alejo, L., Montalvo-Pérez, A., Talavera, E., Moral-González, S., & Lucía Mulas, A. (2020). Functional Threshold Power: Relationship With Respiratory Compensation Point and Effects of Various Warm-Up Protocols. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 15(7), 1047–1051. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0402spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijspp.2019-0402
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.issn1555-0273
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/9158
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.uemEntrenamiento deportivospa
dc.subject.uemFisiología humanaspa
dc.subject.uemAparato respiratoriospa
dc.subject.unescoDeportespa
dc.subject.unescoEfectos fisiológicosspa
dc.subject.unescoAparato respiratoriospa
dc.titleFunctional Threshold Power: Relationship With Respiratory Compensation Point and Effects of Various Warm-Up Protocolsspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication68de99de-52a0-4d15-a265-0ae2b451167e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8c9501c2-c3f1-4a7e-aa0d-a971fab26e06
relation.isAuthorOfPublication654f3a98-4e22-49b8-8a40-1f737b4e87c9
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationef9e84f8-5aa8-4a82-8c78-f8e4a629f773
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd3691359-d7bd-4a12-b84e-338e28c81f9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery68de99de-52a0-4d15-a265-0ae2b451167e

Files