A Flexible Decision Tool for Implementing Post-editing Guidelines

dc.contributor.authorRico Pérez, Celia
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-27T17:26:17Z
dc.date.available2013-11-27T17:26:17Z
dc.date.issued2012spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a flexible tool which supports the decision making process involved in defining post-editing guidelines. It is inspired by the work of O’Brien (2012) towards a translation quality assessment model, briefly reviewed here with a view to adapting it to post-editing specifications. The paper first presents a review of the relevant literature on post-editing, followed by an account of the challenges involved in defining post-editing rules. The different components of the decision tool are then presented and illustrated with examples. Finally, a discussion of its effectiveness is advanced together with some indications for further work.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impactNo data (2012)spa
dc.identifier.citationRico-Pérez, C. (2012). A flexible decision tool for implementing post-editing guidelines. Localisation Focus, 11(1), 54-66.spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/603
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.localisation.ie/resources/publications/2012/161
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.subject.unescoPeriodismospa
dc.titleA Flexible Decision Tool for Implementing Post-editing Guidelinesspa
dc.title.alternativeThis paper presents a flexible tool which supports the decision making process involved in defining post-editing guidelines.spa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbd630fda-0d18-421e-8f0c-683dca0c4852
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybd630fda-0d18-421e-8f0c-683dca0c4852

Files