A Comparison of Two Fluorescent Stains for the Evaluation of Bioceramic Sealer Penetration into the Tubular Dentine Using Confocal Microscopy

dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Amaia
dc.contributor.authorCastagnola, Raffaella
dc.contributor.authorGrande, Nicola María
dc.contributor.authorLoroño Goikoechea, Gaizka
dc.contributor.authorConde Villar, Antonio Jesús
dc.contributor.authorEstévez Luaña, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorMarigo, Luca
dc.contributor.authorPérez Alfayate, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-15T18:52:52Z
dc.date.available2025-02-15T18:52:52Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the percentage of bioceramic sealer penetration and maximum penetration sealer depending on the fluorescent staining method when evaluated with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). In total, 42 single-rooted premolars were instrumented. Two groups of 20 teeth each were filled using the single cone technique. TotalFill BC Sealer® mixed with Rhodamine B was used for the first group and TotalFill BC Sealer® mixed with Fluo-3 for the second group. Two teeth made up the control group. All teeth were sectioned at 3 and 6 mm from the apex and were analyzed with CLSM. The canal perimeter where the tubular penetration happened and the maximum penetration of each sample were calculated. There were no significant differences between the two groups in either the apical or medial sections. In terms of maximum penetration, Rhodamine B had greater tubular penetration in the apical sections, and it had similar results to Fluo-3 in the medial sections. TotalFill BC Sealer® has a higher tubular penetration in the medial slices than in the apical slices regardless of the fluorescent stain used. Rhodamine B has higher results than Fluo-3 in terms of the percentage of sealer penetration and maximum penetration.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact2.5 Q1 JCR 2023spa
dc.description.impact0.508 Q2 SJR 2023
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2023
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationDelgado, A., Castagnola, R., Grande, N. M., Loroño, G., Conde, A., Estevez, R., Marigo, L., & Pérez-Alfayate, R. (2024). A comparison of two fluorescent stains for the evaluation of bioceramic sealer penetration into the tubular dentine using confocal microscopy. Applied Sciences, 14(17), 7738. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177738spa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app14177738
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/13675
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app14177738spa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherMicroscopía Confocalspa
dc.subject.otherMateriales de Obturación del Conducto Radicularspa
dc.subject.sdgGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
dc.subject.unescoOdontologíaspa
dc.subject.unescoTecnología médicaspa
dc.titleA Comparison of Two Fluorescent Stains for the Evaluation of Bioceramic Sealer Penetration into the Tubular Dentine Using Confocal Microscopyeng
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc7cd55ac-c2a1-4023-955d-9afaf0747171
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6e56757c-351f-4b28-805c-cd5259c180f4
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa3839b8e-ca10-4182-956e-d0859d83867c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication83bb9196-4691-4df7-bd99-d6894d387007
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc7cd55ac-c2a1-4023-955d-9afaf0747171

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Comparison of Two Fluorescent_2023.pdf
Size:
1.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: