Influence of Different Upper Cervical Positions on Electromyography Activity of the Masticatory Muscles

dc.contributor.authorBallenberger, Nikolausspa
dc.contributor.authorvon Piekartz, Harryspa
dc.contributor.authorParís-Alemany, Albaspa
dc.contributor.authorLa Touche Arbizu, Roy Arturo
dc.contributor.authorAngulo Díaz-Parreño, Santiagospa
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-27T17:26:49Z
dc.date.available2013-11-27T17:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2012spa
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the activity of the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles in relation to different positions of the upper cervical spine during maximal voluntary isometric clenching by surface electromyography (EMG). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with a repeated-measures design performed using 25 asymptomatic subjects (13 female and 12 male; mean age, 31 years; SD, 8.51). The EMG activity of the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles was recorded bilaterally during maximal clenching at neutral position and during extension, flexion, ipsilateral lateral flexion, contralateral lateral flexion, and ipsilateral and contralateral rotations in maximal flexion. In addition, the upper cervical range of motion and mandibular excursions were assessed. The EMG activity data were analyzed using a 3-way analysis of variance in which the factors considered were upper cervical position, sex (male and female), and side (right and left), and the hypothesis of importance was the interaction side x position. RESULTS: The 3-way analysis of variance detected statistically significant differences between the several upper cervical positions (F = 13.724; P < .001) but found no significant differences for sex (F = 0.202; P = .658) or side (F = 0.86; P = .53) regarding EMG activity of the masseter muscle. Significant differences were likewise observed for interaction side x position for the masseter muscle (F = 12.726; P < .001). The analysis of the EMG activity of anterior temporalis muscle did not produce statistically significant differences (P > .05). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that the upper cervical movements influence the surface EMG activity of the masseter muscle. These findings support a model in which there are interaction between the craniocervical and the craniomandibular system.spa
dc.description.impact1.647 JCR (2012) Q2, 41/83 Health care sciences & services, 9/22 Integrative & complementary medicine, 20/64 Rehabilitationspa
dc.identifier.citationBallenberger, N., Piekartz, H., París-Alemany, A., Touche-Arbizu, R. A., & Angulo, S. (2012). Influence of different upper cervical positions on electromyography activity of the masticatory muscles. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 35(4), 308-318.spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.020spa
dc.identifier.issn01614754spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/1078
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessen
dc.subject.otherCervical Vertebraespa
dc.subject.otherCraniomandibular Disordersspa
dc.subject.otherMasticatory Systemspa
dc.subject.otherMasseter Musclespa
dc.subject.otherTemporal Musclespa
dc.subject.otherRange of Motionspa
dc.subject.otherHealthy-Young Adultsspa
dc.subject.otherTemporomandibular Disordersspa
dc.subject.otherHead Posturespa
dc.subject.otherSurfacespa
dc.subject.otherElectromyographyspa
dc.subject.otherMotion Devicespa
dc.subject.otherBite Forcespa
dc.subject.otherJawspa
dc.subject.otherPainspa
dc.subject.otherNeckspa
dc.subject.otherHealth Care Sciences & Servicesspa
dc.subject.otherIntegrative & Complementary Medicinespa
dc.subject.otherRehabilitationspa
dc.subject.unescoAnatomíaspa
dc.titleInfluence of Different Upper Cervical Positions on Electromyography Activity of the Masticatory Musclesspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfa917f8b-ed19-4c14-b62c-860f35c5d7d5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfa917f8b-ed19-4c14-b62c-860f35c5d7d5

Files