Changes in accommodative responses with multifocal contact lenses: A pilot study

dc.contributor.authorMadrid-Costa, Davidspa
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Alcocer, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRadhakrishnan, H.spa
dc.contributor.authorFerrer-Blasco, Teresaspa
dc.contributor.authorMontés-Micó, Robertspa
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-27T17:26:31Z
dc.date.available2013-11-27T17:26:31Z
dc.date.issued2011spa
dc.description.abstractOur aim was to evaluate induced changes in pupil and accommodative response for different accommodative stimuli with three different multifocal contact lenses (CLs). Accommodative and pupil responses with three aspheric multifocal CLs of simultaneous focus center near (PureVision Low Add, PureVision High Add and Focus Progressives) for two accommodative stimuli of -2.5 and -4.00 D were recorded in 10 young subjects. Accommodative response, peak velocity, and time constant of accommodation and pupil constriction were assessed. The measurements were evaluated in all the participants with distance-single vision CLs and with the three multifocal CLs. The monocular measurements were performed in a random sequence for each participant. All parameters were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (IRX-3; Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France). Differences were not found in accommodation response for both accommodative stimuli studied between the single vision lens and the three different multifocal CLs (p > 0.05 for both stimuli). For the 2.5 D stimulus, significant differences were not found in peak velocity and time constant between the single vision lens and the three different multifocal CLs (p > 0.05 for all situations); in amplitude of pupil constriction, differences were only found for the situation with PureVision High Add, where the value was lower than the single vision lens (p = 0.015). For the 4.00 D stimulus, differences with single vision lens in peak of velocity and time constant were only found with PureVision Low Add, where the peak velocity value was higher and the time constant was lower (p = 0.024 and p = 0.032 for peak of velocity and time constant, respectively); for amplitude of pupil constriction differences were not found (p > 0.05). In concluion, data obtained in this pilot study suggest that in young observers, the multifocal CLs studied do not induce large changes in accommodative system compared with the single vision lens.spa
dc.description.impact2.108 JCR (2011) Q2, 20/58 Ophthalmologyspa
dc.identifier.citationMadrid-Costa, D., Ruiz-Alcocer, J., Radhakrishnan, H., Ferrer-Blasco, T., & Montés-Micó, R. (2011). Changes in accommodative responses with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study. Optometry & Vision Science, 88(11), 1309-1316.spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/OPX.0b013e31822be35aspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/808
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessen
dc.subject.unescoOftalmologíaspa
dc.titleChanges in accommodative responses with multifocal contact lenses: A pilot studyspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication49c11cd7-8122-4e1b-a814-94ac44f3928e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery49c11cd7-8122-4e1b-a814-94ac44f3928e

Files