Two or Three? Clinical and Proteomic Perspectives on Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Versus Bictegravir/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide as Initial HIV Treatment
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Díaz García, Claudio
Serrano Villar, Sergio
García Ruiz de Morales, Alejandro G.
Güerri Fernández, Robert
Pérez Somarriba, Juncal
Advisors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
While triple-drug regimens (3DR) have long been the standard of care for HIV infection, two-drug regimens (2DR), particularly dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC), have emerged as viable first-line options. However, there is limited understanding of how baseline clinical profiles associated with regimen choice relate to underlying inflammatory states and long-term immune trajectories.
Regimen selection was associated with baseline disease severity and inflammatory burden. Despite being used in patients with more advanced profiles, BIC/F/TAF effectively reduced systemic inflammation over 2 years. Both regimens attenuated inflammatory activity, though with distinct trajectories that may carry implications for immune recovery and long-term outcomes.
Description
UNESCO Subjects
Keywords
Bibliographic reference
Díaz-García, C., Serrano-Villar, S., G. García-Ruiz De Morales, A., Güerri-Fernández, R., Pérez-Somarriba, J., Sánchez Palomino, S., Suárez-García, I., Hernández Gutiérrez, C., Dalmau Juanola, D., Moreno, S., Moreno, E., & Martínez-Sanz, J. (2025). Two or three? Clinical and proteomic perspectives on dolutegravir/lamivudine versus bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide as initial hiv treatment. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 12(11), ofaf626. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf626





