Two or Three? Clinical and Proteomic Perspectives on Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Versus Bictegravir/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide as Initial HIV Treatment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Díaz García, Claudio
Serrano Villar, Sergio
García Ruiz de Morales, Alejandro G.
Güerri Fernández, Robert
Pérez Somarriba, Juncal

Advisors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

SDG

goal-3
goal-9

Metrics

Google Scholar

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

While triple-drug regimens (3DR) have long been the standard of care for HIV infection, two-drug regimens (2DR), particularly dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC), have emerged as viable first-line options. However, there is limited understanding of how baseline clinical profiles associated with regimen choice relate to underlying inflammatory states and long-term immune trajectories. Regimen selection was associated with baseline disease severity and inflammatory burden. Despite being used in patients with more advanced profiles, BIC/F/TAF effectively reduced systemic inflammation over 2 years. Both regimens attenuated inflammatory activity, though with distinct trajectories that may carry implications for immune recovery and long-term outcomes.

Description

Keywords

Bibliographic reference

Díaz-García, C., Serrano-Villar, S., G. García-Ruiz De Morales, A., Güerri-Fernández, R., Pérez-Somarriba, J., Sánchez Palomino, S., Suárez-García, I., Hernández Gutiérrez, C., Dalmau Juanola, D., Moreno, S., Moreno, E., & Martínez-Sanz, J. (2025). Two or three? Clinical and proteomic perspectives on dolutegravir/lamivudine versus bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide as initial hiv treatment. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 12(11), ofaf626. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf626

Type of document

Attribution 4.0 International

La licencia de este ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International