Evolution of regenerative endodontic in young permanent teeth: a literature review

dc.contributor.authorJamet, Jean-Hugues
dc.contributor.authorConde Villar, Antonio Jesús
dc.contributor.authorHoz Calvo, Ana de la
dc.contributor.authorPérez Alfayate, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorLoroño Goikoechea, Gaizka
dc.contributor.authorCorreia de Siqueira, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorEstévez Luaña, Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-15T19:22:06Z
dc.date.available2025-02-15T19:22:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: to compare different protocols available for regenerative endodontic. Methodology: articles published between 2001 and 2021 were searched on the database PubMed using the following keywords: “pulp revascularization” or “pulp revitalization” or “apexification”. Inclusion criteria were studies on humans, patients with immature permanent teeth with necrosis or irreversible pulpitis, a follow-up of at least 12 months, clearly described protocols and in English language. Results: The search produced 944 results. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 35 were selected. 11 articles were added following a bibliographic review of the selected articles and a total of 46 cases were included. The success rate outcome for regenerative endodontic was of 80% observed in a total of 278 teeth. During irrigation, NaOCL was used in most of the cases with concentration varying from 0.5% to 6% and TAP has been the most used intracanal medication (32.7%). Periapical healing and resolution of the symptoms were observed in 95.7%, while apexogenesis was observed in 80.2%. Increase in root length reach 60%, root thickness 64.8% and apical closure 61,9%. Pulp vitality was found in 7.2% of the cases and discoloration in 29.5%. Conclusion: Regenerative endodontic showed signs of apexogenesis in most cases, and a pronounced increase in root thickness, root length and closure of the apex. Due to a high number of protocols and their heterogenicity, the superiority of one over the others cannot be established. More randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the most effective protocol.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impactNo data 2023
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationJamet, J.-H., Conde, A. J., De La Hoz, A., Pérez Alfayate, R., Loroño, G., Siqueira, P. C., & Estevez, R. (2023). Evolution of regenerative endodontic in young permanent teeth: A literature review. Revista Odontológica do Brasil Central, 32(91), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.36065/robrac.v32i91.1662spa
dc.identifier.doi10.36065/robrac.v32i91.1662
dc.identifier.issn1981-3708
dc.identifier.issn0104-7914
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/13676
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.36065/robrac.v32i91.1662spa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherEndodoncia Regenerativaspa
dc.subject.otherApexificaciónspa
dc.subject.otherCavidad Pulparspa
dc.subject.unescoOdontologíaspa
dc.titleEvolution of regenerative endodontic in young permanent teeth: a literature reviewspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6e56757c-351f-4b28-805c-cd5259c180f4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication13cbf49b-20f7-48b7-8b0b-4161e9c15b99
relation.isAuthorOfPublication83bb9196-4691-4df7-bd99-d6894d387007
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc7cd55ac-c2a1-4023-955d-9afaf0747171
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa3839b8e-ca10-4182-956e-d0859d83867c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6e56757c-351f-4b28-805c-cd5259c180f4

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Comparison of Two Fluorescent_2023.pdf
Size:
1.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: