Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces

dc.contributor.authorGarcía Unanue, Jorge Fernando
dc.contributor.authorFernández Luna, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorBurillo Naranjo, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorGallardo Guerrero, Leonor
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Sánchez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorManzano Carrasco, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorFelipe Hernández, José Luis
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T14:31:50Z
dc.date.available2020-10-29T14:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to examine the key performance indicators of female professional soccer players during the 2011 and 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup, played on different surfaces (natural and artificial turf respectively). A total of 438 women from 24 national teams who participated at Canada 2015 (artificial turf) and 283 players from 16 national teams who played in Germany 2011 (natural grass) were selected for this study. The collected data were provided by OPTA Sports. Twenty-nine key performance indicators were included for analysis. The variables were calculated for the total sample and independently by positions (defense, midfielders and forwards) for matches on natural grass (2011) and artificial turf (2015). A Mann–Whitney U test was used out to identify differences between the sport surfaces. Moreover, a discriminant analysis was performed with the forced entry method to find the variables that better differentiated between the FIFA Women's World Cup 2011 (natural grass) and FIFA Women's World Cup 2015 (artificial turf). Key performance aspects were very similar between the two tournaments, but on natural grass, we observed a significantly higher number of total passes, successful dribbles, total tackles, successful tackles and interceptions. However, on artificial turf there were significantly higher percentages of success in total passes, and a higher number of fouls. This is an important factor for the choice of an elite competition surface because technical actions are crucial to the quality of the game and can influence the future behavior of spectators and fans.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact3.240 JCR (2020) Q2, 26/73 Multidisciplinary Sciencesspa
dc.description.impact0.990 SJR (2020) Q1, 13/135 Multidisciplinaryspa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2019spa
dc.description.sponsorship2015/UEM08spa
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Unanue, J., Fernández-Luna, Á., Burillo, P., Gallardo, L., Sánchez-Sánchez, J., Manzano-Carrasco, S., & Felipe, J. L. (2020). Key performance indicators at FIFA Women’s World Cup in different playing surfaces. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0241385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241385spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0241385
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/9243
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.uemMujeresspa
dc.subject.uemFutbolistasspa
dc.subject.uemSuperficies (Tecnología)spa
dc.subject.unescoMujerspa
dc.subject.unescoDeportespa
dc.subject.unescoTecnología de materialesspa
dc.titleKey performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfacesspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8b785fb1-fee8-4d8a-8bcc-4e975d464da4
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione53f0ff2-2a2d-4250-8906-e82eaea72d57
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8cd37ed3-5bf2-429b-94d6-619e873207fc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication04f97791-47fa-4516-b12f-83c10de74eea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication67acdf55-2cbb-4304-bd5e-8064bdb4bcc3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b785fb1-fee8-4d8a-8bcc-4e975d464da4

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Fernández_Burillo_Plos1_2020.pdf
Size:
463.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión del editor