Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorAbuín Porras, Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorVilla Muñoz, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorVelázquez Saornil, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Milá, Zacarías
dc.contributor.authorRomero Morales, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorAlmazán Polo, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorBaraja Vegas, Luis
dc.contributor.authorVillafañe, Jorge Hugo
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-23T10:48:00Z
dc.date.available2025-11-23T10:48:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjective Shoulder pain, primarily due to rotator cuff tendinopathy, significantly impacts function and quality of life, with considerable socioeconomic implications. Physiotherapy myofascial trigger point therapy (MPT) is traditionally used, but therapeutic exercise (TE) has gained attention for its potential administrative and implementation benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TE compared with MPT in treating shoulder tendinopathies. Methods A single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted comparing TE and MPT. Outcome measures included pain intensity with the Numerical Rating Scale, pressure pain threshold (PPT) and range of motion (ROM), assessed before and after 10 treatment sessions. A total number of 72 participants (TE group n=36 age 49.22±15.29/MTP group n=36 age 49.03±19.12) participated in the study. Interventions Participants in both groups were evaluated before treatment and after 10 sessions. A total of 10 sessions were conducted over 5 weeks of intervention. Results Both interventions showed improvements in pain intensity and ROM, with no significant differences between the groups in most measures except PPT, where TE demonstrated a greater decrease in pressure-induced pain. Conclusion TE could serve as an alternative to manual therapy, offering cost–benefit advantages, especially in administration via telecare and group sessions, highlighting its broader application in physiotherapy.
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact3.3 Q1 JCR 2024spa
dc.description.impact1.330 Q1 SJR 2024spa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2024spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSIN FINANCIACIÓN
dc.identifier.citationVilla Muñoz, T., Velázquez Saornil, J., Sánchez Milá, Z., Romero-Morales, C., Almazán Polo, J., Baraja Vegas, L., Hugo Villafañe, J., & Abuín-Porras, V. (2024). Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 10(4), e002043. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002043
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002043
dc.identifier.issn2055-7647
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11268/16510
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedSi
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002043
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.otherTerapia de liberación miofascial
dc.subject.otherTerapia por ejercicio
dc.subject.sdgGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
dc.subject.unescoFisiología humana
dc.subject.unescoDeporte
dc.titleComparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0a34e108-6aec-4009-acc2-1dea637edad5
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf7e55b2b-699c-4e9e-b57a-d4faaee07ffe
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationff40ecdd-f155-400b-94d0-c7d823b46be5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4adbada5-6908-47e1-a7e8-b70d0a27a54d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0a34e108-6aec-4009-acc2-1dea637edad5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0a34e108-6aec-4009-acc2-1dea637edad5

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparative evaluation_2024.pdf
Size:
256.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format