Spinal mechanisms and feasibility of Dry Needling versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in poststroke lower limb spasticity: A proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial protocol (STROKE-POC)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Pujol Fuentes, Clara
Eeckhaut, Bart
Fernández Carnero, Samuel
Fernández Sanchís, Daniel
Wein, Theodore

Advisors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

SDG

goal-3

Metrics

Google Scholar

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Stroke often causes spasticity, impacting mobility and quality of life. Botulinum Toxin type A and Dry Needling are treatments that reduce spasticity, although Botulinum Toxin type A injections can cause adverse effects. No studies have directly compared their effects at spinal, muscular, functional, quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness levels. This study aims to determine the spinal mechanisms of BTX-A and DN on post-stroke lower limb spasticity, while also assessing feasibility, safety, and exploratory effects at muscular, functional, quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness levels.

Description

Keywords

Bibliographic reference

Pujol-Fuentes, C., Eeckhaut, B., Fernández Carnero, S., Fernández Sanchís, D., Wein, T., Herrero, P., Saeys, W., & Levin, M. F. (2026). Spinal mechanisms and feasibility of Dry Needling versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial protocol (Stroke-poc). PLOS One, 21(5), e0334571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334571

Type of document

Attribution 4.0 International

La licencia de este ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International