Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues

dc.contributor.authorAngulo Cuesta, Javier
dc.contributor.authorArance Gil, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorApesteguy, Yannick
dc.contributor.authorFelicio, João
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Natália
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Francisco
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-05T11:13:59Z
dc.date.available2022-09-05T11:13:59Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate efficacy of urorectal fistula (URF) repair using different approaches and the clinical factor determinant of success, and also the morbidity associated to the procedure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in male survivors of pelvic malignancies. Material and methods: Retrospective evaluation of 39 patients with URF primarily intervened in three institutions using different surgical approaches. Success was defined as effective fistula closure. Variables evaluated included demographics, previous treatments, surgical approach, ancillary surgeries, complications and HRQoL by using a standardized non-validated specific questionnaire. Median follow-up from surgery to interview was 55 months (interquartile range 49, range 4-112). Factors determinant of success were investigated using logistic regression. Safety of the procedure was evaluated by Clavien-Dindo scale. Deterioration of continence and erectile function and other HRQoL issues were evaluated. Results: Prostate cancer treatment was the predominant etiology. The success rate for fistula repair was 89.5%. The surgical approach was not related to failed repair (p=0.35) or complications (p=0.29). Factors associated with failure were complications (p=0.025), radiotherapy (p=0.03), fistula location (p=0.04) and fistula size (p=0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed fistula size was the only independent determinant of failure (OR 6.904, 1.01-47.75). Complications occurred in 46.2% and severe complications in 12.8%. The mortality related to the procedure was 2.6%. Urinary incontinence was present before repair in 26.3% and erectile dysfunction in 89.5%. Fistula repair caused de novo urinary incontinence in 7.9% and deterioration of erectile status in 44.7%. Globally 79% were satisfied after repair and only 7.9% rated HRQoL as unhappy. Trans-sphincteric approach was related to less deterioration of erectile function (p=0.003), and higher perceived satisfaction in QoL (p=0.04). Conclusions: The surgical approach elected to correct URF is not determinant of success nor of complications. Fistula size appears as independent determinant for failure. Trans-sphincteric approach could be advantageous over other procedures regarding HRQoL issues.spa
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impactNo data JCR 2021spa
dc.description.impact0.472 SJR (2021) Q2, 53/108 Urologyspa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2021spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationAngulo, J., Arance, I., Apesteguy, Y., Felicio, J., Martins, N., & Martins, F. (2021). Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues. International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 47(2), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0476spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0476
dc.identifier.issn1677-5538
dc.identifier.issn16776119
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/11572
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0476spa
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherProcedimientos quirúrgicos operativosspa
dc.subject.otherUrologíaspa
dc.subject.unescoMedicina preventivaspa
dc.subject.unescoCalidad de vidaspa
dc.titleUrorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issuesspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationeaadbb3a-67c4-43f5-b477-5fb2318b809a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication25289cfb-2724-4dbd-929c-fd92cf10943f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryeaadbb3a-67c4-43f5-b477-5fb2318b809a

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Angulo_2021.pdf
Size:
1.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión del editor