Electromyographic Patterns of Muscle Activation During Running with Different Footwear at Different Speeds in Nulliparous Women: A Secondary Analysis

dc.contributor.authorGarcía Arrabe, María
dc.contributor.authorGuerineau, Fabien
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Ruiz, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorLópez Ruiz, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Mateos, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorGiménez Mestre, María José
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-24T10:35:51Z
dc.date.available2026-02-24T10:35:51Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractWith the global increase in women’s participation in running, understanding factors like footwear in performance and injury prevention has become essential. Minimalist shoes (MSs) and traditional shoes (TSs) influence muscle activation patterns, affecting running technique. Proper coordination of the core muscles is essential for efficient stride and posture. This study analyzed muscle activation in nulliparous women running in MSs and TSs at different speeds and explored the correlations with age and BMI. A crossover clinical trial assessed the EMG activation of the lumbar erector (LE), gluteus maximus (GM), pelvic floor, and internal oblique (IO) muscles during treadmill running at 6, 9, and 11 km/h. Fifty-one healthy women (26.55 ± 5.11 years; body mass index (BMI): 21.29 ± 2.07 kg/m2) participated. The protocol included a warm-up, 30 s runs at each speed, and a 5-minute washout between trials. The statistical analyses included Wilcoxon, Friedman, and Spearman’s correlation tests. GM and IO showed the highest activation (p < 0.001) regardless of the footwear or speed. No significant differences were found between MSs and TSs. Weak-to-moderate correlations emerged between BMI and LE muscle activation with MSs, and between BMI and IO with both footwear. Significant correlations were also found with IO activations, but none with PF muscles. The correlations between personal variables, shoe types, and muscle activation suggest that individual and external factors may influence neuromuscular modulation, impacting injury prevention and personalized interventions.en
dc.description.filiationUEMspa
dc.description.impact3.5 Q2 JCR 2024
dc.description.impact0.764 Q1 SJR 2024
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2024
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiación
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Arrabé, M., Guerineau, F., Ruiz-Ruiz, B., López-Ruiz, J., García-Mateos, M., & Giménez, M.-J. (2025). Electromyographic patterns of muscle activation during running with different footwear at different speeds in nulliparous women: A secondary analysis. Sensors, 25(10), 3016. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103016
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s25103016
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11268/16877
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedSi
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/s25103016
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.otherElectromiografía
dc.subject.otherSuelo pélvico
dc.subject.otherEstabilidad central
dc.subject.sdgGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
dc.subject.sdgGoal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
dc.subject.unescoDeporte
dc.subject.unescoMujer
dc.subject.unescoRehabilitación médica
dc.titleElectromyographic Patterns of Muscle Activation During Running with Different Footwear at Different Speeds in Nulliparous Women: A Secondary Analysisen
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationabd46d4c-eef2-40d7-afb0-c0807614f859
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4d806815-3ec3-4bb4-89f5-724c18e3b2c5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication450f5fac-6d95-4171-9460-e8dfb9c08c11
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0d58d799-b295-44d0-b218-6ef8727337c5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication30f94dc4-9c8a-4ec2-b3f9-c3d404ce9bfa
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryabd46d4c-eef2-40d7-afb0-c0807614f859

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Electromyographic Pattern_2026.pdf
Size:
5.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format