Effect of Traditional, Cluster, and Rest Redistribution Set Configurations on Neuromuscular and Perceptual Responses During Strength-Oriented Resistance Training

dc.contributor.authorCuevas Aburto, Jesualdo
dc.contributor.authorJukic, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorChirosa Ríos, Luis Javier
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Hernández, Jorge Miguel
dc.contributor.authorJanicijevic, Danica
dc.contributor.authorBarboza González, Paola
dc.contributor.authorGuede Rojas, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Ramos, Amador
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T17:57:29Z
dc.date.available2022-04-26T17:57:29Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the acute effect of traditional (TR), cluster (CL), and rest redistribution (RR) set configurations on neuromuscular and perceptual measures of fatigue. Thirty-one resistance-trained men randomly performed a Control session and 3 experimental sessions consisting of the squat (SQ) and bench press (BP) exercises performed against the 10 repetition maximum load using TR (3 sets of 6 repetitions; 3 minutes of interset rest), CL (3 sets of 6 repetitions; 30 seconds of intraset rest every 2 repetitions; 3 minutes of interset rest), and RR (9 sets of 2 repetitions; 45 seconds of interset rest) set configurations. A significant effect of "set configuration" (p = 0.002) was observed for barbell velocity. The average velocity of the training session was lower for TR compared with CL (% difference = 5.09% in SQ and 5.68% in BP) and RR (% difference = 5.92% in SQ and 2.71% in BP). The 3 set configurations induced comparable decrements in countermovement jump height (% difference from -6.0% to -8.1%) and throwing velocity (% difference from -0.6% to -1.2%). Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE-10) values collected after the sets were higher for TR (SQ: 6.9 ± 0.7 a.u.; BP: 6.8 ± 0.8 a.u.) compared with CL (SQ: 6.2 ± 0.8 a.u.; BP: 6.4 ± 0.7 a.u.) and RR (SQ: 6.2 ± 0.8 a.u.; BP: 6.6 ± 0.9 a.u.), while the session RPE did not differ between the set configurations (p = 0.595). CL and RR set configurations allow for higher velocities and lower RPE values during resistance training sessions not performed to failure in comparison with a TR set configuration.spa
dc.description.filiationUECspa
dc.description.impact3.781 JCR (2020) Q2, 25/88 Sport Sciencesspa
dc.description.impact1.569 SJR (2020) Q1, 28/288 Orthopedics and Sports Medicinespa
dc.description.impactNo data IDR 2020spa
dc.description.sponsorshipSin financiaciónspa
dc.identifier.citationCuevas-Aburto, J., Jukic, I., Chirosa-Ríos, L. J., González-Hernández, J. M., Janicijevic, D., Barboza-González, P., Guede-Rojas, F., & García-Ramos, A. (2020). Effect of Traditional, Cluster, and Rest Redistribution Set Configurations on Neuromuscular and Perceptual Responses During Strength-Oriented Resistance Training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003658spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000003658
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011
dc.identifier.issn1533-4287
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/11146
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessspa
dc.subject.otherEntrenamiento de intervalos de alta intensidadspa
dc.subject.otherEntrenamiento de fuerzaspa
dc.subject.unescoMedicina deportivaspa
dc.titleEffect of Traditional, Cluster, and Rest Redistribution Set Configurations on Neuromuscular and Perceptual Responses During Strength-Oriented Resistance Trainingspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files