Efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File System on Cleaning and Shaping Oval Canals: A Microbiological and Microscopic Evaluation

dc.contributor.authorParanjpe, Avinaspa
dc.contributor.authorGregorio González, César de
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Ana Maríaspa
dc.contributor.authorGómez, Ariannaspa
dc.contributor.authorSilva Herzog, Danielspa
dc.contributor.authorAragón Pina, Antoniospa
dc.contributor.authorCohenca, Néstorspa
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-27T17:26:52Z
dc.date.available2013-11-27T17:26:52Z
dc.date.issued2012spa
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The shaping ability of root canal instruments is determined by a complex interrelationship of parameters such as cross-sectional design and the ability to remove debris and the smear layer. The self-adjusting file (SAF) consists of a hollow, flexible instrument in the form of a compressible, thin-walled, pointed cylinder. The aim of this study was to compare the SAF with the ProTaper rotary file system, evaluating debris and smear layer removal and the presence of bacteria by using microbiological and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation. METHODS: Fifty maxillary premolars were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis for 30 days and then randomly distributed into 2 groups. Group 1 was prepared with ProTaper rotary instruments and irrigated with 30-gauge side-vented needles. Group 2 was prepared by using the SAF system with continuous irrigation. Bacteriologic samples were taken before and after preparation. All samples were then longitudinally split and analyzed under scanning electron microscopy. The scoring was carried out by 3 blinded evaluators. RESULTS: In group 1, 40% of samples had negative cultures with postinstrumentation samples taken with paper points (S2a) and 45% with postinstrumentation dentin samples (S2b). In group 2, 20% of samples had negative cultures with S2a and 15% with S2b. Intragroup analyses evaluating the reduction in the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) from S1 to S2a and S2b demonstrated both preparation techniques were highly effective (P < .01). Further reduction of CFUs was observed when comparing S2a and S2b in group 1 (P < .05), whereas no difference was observed in group 2. Intergroup analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference of CFUs at S2a and S2b (P < .05). SEM scores were consistent with the microbiology findings. CONCLUSIONS: The SAF system does not allow control of the apical enlargement, thus limiting the ability of the irrigants to achieve effective and predictable disinfection.spa
dc.description.impact2.929 JCR (2012) Q1, 8/83 Dentistry, oral surgery & medicinespa
dc.identifier.citationParanjpe, A., Gregorio-González, C., González, A. M., Gómez, A., Silva-Herzog, D., Aragón-Piña, A., & Cohenca, N. (2012). Efficacy of the self-adjusting file system on cleaning and shaping oval canals: a microbiological and microscopic evaluation. Journal of Endodontics, 38(2), 226-231.spa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.014spa
dc.identifier.issn00992399spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/1114
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.peerreviewedSispa
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted accessen
dc.subject.otherBacteriaspa
dc.subject.otherCleaning Efficacyspa
dc.subject.otherProtaperspa
dc.subject.otherRoot Canal Disinfectionspa
dc.subject.otherSafspa
dc.subject.otherSemspa
dc.subject.otherMicro-Computed Tomographyspa
dc.subject.otherShaped Root Canalsspa
dc.subject.otherAntimicrobial Efficacyspa
dc.subject.otherSmear Layerspa
dc.subject.otherInstrumentsspa
dc.subject.otherDebridementspa
dc.subject.otherMolarsspa
dc.subject.otherDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicinespa
dc.subject.unescoOdontologíaspa
dc.titleEfficacy of the Self-Adjusting File System on Cleaning and Shaping Oval Canals: A Microbiological and Microscopic Evaluationspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationec67a8a4-6cfe-40a4-a8c7-922a6e79d21d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryec67a8a4-6cfe-40a4-a8c7-922a6e79d21d

Files