Río Carrillo, Regina María delMolinero-Mourelle, PedroVera González, VicenteRomero Villalba, PabloCasañas, ElisabethFonseca, ManriqueVera González, VicenteMourelle Martínez, María Rosa2023-05-032023-05-032021Río Carrillo, R. M., Molinero-Mourelle, P., Vera, V., Romero Villaba, P., Casañas, E., Fonseca, M., Vera-González, V., & Mourelle-Martínez, M. R. (2021). Micro push-out bond strength of resin composite to dentin in primary dentition using three universal adhesives with different ph: An in vitro study. Applied Sciences, 11(14), 6349. https://doi.org/10.3390/app111463492076-3417http://hdl.handle.net/11268/11991To evaluate the bond strength of different universal adhesives on deciduous tooth dentine and their relationship with the composition and potential of hydrogen (pH). Methods: An in vitro micro push-out test on 150 samples (n = 50) per group per adhesive, namely, Adhese Universal (ADH; Ivoclar Vivadent), Futurabond U (FUT; Voco GmbH) (Test), and Scotchbond Universal with pre-conditioning (SCO; 3M) (Control), to record bond strength (BS) and type of adhesive failure. Results: The results of the different adhesives (megapascals (MPa)) varied, showing no statistical significance. The corresponding averages are in MPa: ADH, 13.66 ± 2.81; FUT, 14.48 ± 2.88; SCO, 14.98 ± 3.96. Additionally, the frequency of type of failure was as follows: mixed (60.7%), adhesive (27.3%), and cohesive (12%). Conclusions: SCO, with a pH of 2.7, showed greater resistance to fracture, while FUT, with a pH of 2.3 and no pre-conditioning, approached the same values, being a one-step adhesive. No relationship was found between failure and type of adhesive.spaAtribución 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Materiales dentalesMateriales biocompatiblesCementos dentalesjournal article10.3390/app11146349open accessOdontologíaTecnología médica