Urmeneta Ulloa, JavierPozo Osinalde, EduardoCabrera Rodríguez, José ÁngelRecio Rodríguez, ManuelThuissard Vasallo, Israel JohnAndreu Vázquez, CristinaIslas, FabianMarcos Alberca, PedroMahía, PatriciaMartínez de Vega, VicenteEt al.2023-03-012023-03-012023Urmeneta Ulloa, J., Pozo Osinalde, E., Cabrera, J. A., Recio Rodríguez, M., Thuissard-Vasallo, I. J., Andreu-Vázquez, C., Islas, F., Pérez de Isla, L., Marcos-Alberca, P., Mahía, P., Cobos, M. A., Cabeza, B., Rodríguez-Hernández, J. L., Luaces Méndez, M., Gómez de Diego, J. J., Bustos, A., Pérez-Villacastín, J., Agustín, A., & Martínez De Vega, V. (2023). Relevance of subclinical right ventricular dysfunction measured by feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 23(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03044-x1471-2261http://hdl.handle.net/11268/11860Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM) is associated with cardiovascular events. To analyze the feasibility of assessing RV myocardial deformation by feature tracking (FT)-cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and its usefulness as a prognostic marker. Retrospective study of NICM patients undergoing CMR. Longitudinal FT-RV free wall (LFT-RVFW) and fractional area change (FAC) were obtained. Correlation with standard RV parameters was studied. An association with combined event (heart failure (HF), ICD implantation or cardiovascular death) was assessed using a logistic regression model. Results 98 patients (64±13 years) were included. Left ventricular (LV) systolic function (LVEF 29.5±9.6%, 47% with LVEF≥30%) and RV (RVEF 52.2±14.6%, 72% with RVEF≥45%). Follow-up of 38±17 months, 26.5% presented at least one admission for HF. An excellent correlation of LFT-RVFW (r=0.82) and FAC (r=0.83) with RVEF was evident. No association of RV-FT parameters with prognosis entire study population was found. However, in patients with LVEF≥30%, admissions for HF were associated with lower LFT-RVFW (−21.6 ± 6.6% vs −31.3 ± 10%; p = 0.006) and FAC (36.6 ± 9.6% vs 50.5 ± 13.4%; p < 0.001) values. Similar diferences were observed when only patients with RVEF≥45% were considered. An LFT-RVFW cut-of point of -19.5% and FAC of 36.5% showed good prognostic performance. Decreased LFT-RVFW or FAC represented an independent predictor of combined event in patients with LVEF≥30%. Conclusions In NICM patients without severe LV dysfunction, decreased values of LFT-RVFW and/or FAC were associated with HF admissions, independently of RVEF.engAttribution 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Imagen por resonancia magnéticaCardiomiopatía dilatadaDisfunción ventricular derechajournal article10.1186/s12872-023-03044-xopen accessEnfermedad cardiovascularMedicina preventivaTecnología médica