Zorrilla Revilla, GuillermoPrado Nóvoa, OlallaDavy, Kevin P.García González, RebecaLaskaridou, EleniHoward, Kristen R.Marinik, Elaina L.Carretero, José MiguelVolpe, Stella L.2025-11-112025-11-112025Zorrilla‐Revilla, G., Prado‐Nóvoa, O., Davy, K. P., García‐González, R., Laskaridou, E., Howard, K. R., Marinik, E. L., Carretero, J. M., & Volpe, S. L. (2025). Morphological influences and energetic walking flexibility in determining preferred vs. Optimal speeds: An evolutionary human ecology perspective on children and adolescents. American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 188(3), e70152. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.701522692-7691https://hdl.handle.net/11268/16461Locomotion is fundamental to the survival of our species. The most comfortable walking speed may be the most efficient for allocating conserved energy for other functions. However, whether preferred (PLS) and optimal (OLS) speeds align in children and adolescents remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether OLS and PLS are similar in children and adolescents and how anthropometry influences both speeds and their differences. Unlike adults, OLS and PLS are not interchangeable in children and adolescents. Participants with lower χ2 CoT (greater flexibility) can select comfortable speeds farther from OLS without energetic penalty. Taller individuals with longer femurs and wider hips might have biomechanical advantages in reaching higher OLS and PLS, but this reduces flexibility. These traits, along with the growth and development pattern of Homo sapiens, may reflect evolutionary advantages relevant to interspecies competition.engAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/journal article10.1002/ajpa.70152open accessCiencias médicasAntropologíaPsicología del desarrolloGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all agesGoal 4: Quality educationGoal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries