Alcobendas-Maestro, MónicaEsclarín-Ruz, AnaCasado-López, Rosa M.Muñoz-González, AlejandroPérez Mateos, GuillermoGonzález Valdizán, EstebanRodríguez Martín, José Luis2013-11-272013-11-272012Alcobendas-Maestro, M., Esclarín-Ruz, A., Casado-López, R. M., Muñoz-González, A., Pérez-Mateos, G., González-Valdizán, E., & Rodríguez-Martín, J. L. (2012). Lokomat robotic-assisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(9), 1058-1063.15526844http://hdl.handle.net/11268/151About 75% of persons with ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) Impairment Scale C and D incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) achieve walking ability. Our objective was to compare a walking reeducation program using Lokomat with conventional overgroundengRobotics*Spinal Cord Injuries/*RehabilitationWalking/*PhysiologyAdultExercise TherapyFemaleGait/PhysiologyHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMuscle Strength/PhysiologyOdds RatioPain/EtiologyPain/PsychologyPain MeasurementPhysical Endurance/PhysiologyRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord Injuries/PhysiopathologyTreatment OutcomeLokomat robotic-assisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trialjournal article10.1177/1545968312448232open accessCiencias médicas