dc.contributor.author |
Ticona Flores, Jesús Miguel |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Reichard Monefeldt, Guillermo |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Diéguez Pérez, Montserrat
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2025-01-11T10:24:57Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2025-01-11T10:24:57Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Ticona-Flores, J. M., Reichard-Monefeldt, G., & Diéguez-Pérez, M. (2024). Possible link between the preferential unilateral chewing side and eruptive guidance of the maxillary canine germ: Cross-sectional study on panoramic radiographs. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 85(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00566-7 |
spa |
dc.identifier.issn |
1615-6714 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1434-5293 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11268/13443 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Aim: To determine whether unilateral preferent chewing (UPC) affects the position and angulation of the permanent maxillary canine germ on the preferred side.
Materials and methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional study, medical records from children 7.91(± 0.8) years old with unilateral preferred chewing side and unilateral posterior crossbite were selected. The position of the maxillary canines was analysed by measuring the following angles and distances: the angles formed between the canine axis and the midline (PS; potential impact range > 15°), and that between the canine axis and the bicondylar line (W; potential impact range < 75°). In addition, the canine's position with respect to the lateral incisor (EK; potential impact range > II) and the distance between the canine cusp and the occlusal plane (CCOP potential impact range > 10 mm) were measured.
Results: The final sample consisted of 106 radiographs; thus, a total of 212 maxillary canines were analysed. Tooth angulation on the preferred chewing side was higher for the angle PS with an average angle of 13.88° (± 7.56) and its position was more frequently found in sector II (49.1%), according to the EK analysis, compared to its contralateral that had an average of 11.75° (± 10.13) for the PS angle and a frequency of 67% in the sector I (p < 0.05 in both analyses). The data obtained for the angle W resulted in an average of 76.12° (± 9.09), while on the contralateral side it was 77.16° (± 12.56; p = 0.012). Lastly, according to the CCOP analysis, the preferred chewing side measured on average 15.3 mm (± 2.4), while on the nonpreferred side it was 15.19 mm (± 2.43; p = 0.143).
Conclusions: Based on this research, UPC seems to have a certain unfavourable influence on canine position and angulation. Thus, this is another factor to consider in decision-making regarding early treatment of this development disorder. |
spa |
dc.description.sponsorship |
Sin financiación |
spa |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
spa |
dc.subject.other |
Odontopediatría |
spa |
dc.title |
Possible link between the preferential unilateral chewing side and eruptive guidance of the maxillary canine germ : Cross-sectional study on panoramic radiographs |
spa |
dc.type |
article |
spa |
dc.description.impact |
1.3 Q3 JCR 2023 |
spa |
dc.description.impact |
0.658 Q1 SJR 2023 |
|
dc.description.impact |
No data IDR 2023 |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1007/s00056-024-00566-7 |
|
dc.rights.accessRights |
openAccess |
spa |
dc.subject.unesco |
Odontología |
spa |
dc.subject.unesco |
Radiografía |
spa |
dc.description.filiation |
UEM |
spa |
dc.relation.publisherversion |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00566-7 |
spa |
dc.peerreviewed |
Si |
spa |